this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)
D&D Next - 5e Discussion
3002 readers
5 users here now
A place to discuss the latest version of Dungeons & Dragons, the fifth edition, known during the playtest as D&D Next.
Join our discord! https://discord.gg/dndnext
-- Rules --
- Be Civil. Unacceptable behavior includes name calling, taunting, baiting, flaming, etc. Please respect the opinions of people who play differently than you do.
- Use Clear, Concise Titles.
- Limit Self-Promotional Links. External links to blogs, kickstarters, storefronts, YouTube channels, etc, must be related to DnD and posted no more than once every 14 days. Affiliate links are never allowed.
This is a new community and the rules are in flux. Please bear with us (and give your feedback!) as we navigate building this new community. Thank you!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Personally, I wouldn't mind fancy 3D models and animations. In theory. But to use a VTT with them requires much more prep as a GM than just playing theatre of the mind, or on a Paizo flipmat with a few quick dry-erase walls and pillars scribbled on. I want to spend my prep time prepping story, combat balance, and understanding NPC motivations & abilities, not meticulously placing assets on 3D battle maps. And then at the table, I want to be able to reach out in front to a shared space between me and the players, not have to figure out how everyone can look at the same virtual screen.
Even playing online, Roll20 does a much better job of replicating that at-the-table experience with a simple grid that you can hastily draw on if you want. In a fully 3D environment that really isn't going to work. The chasm between the players' character tokens and the fancy animations when they cast their abilities, and the white void they'll be standing in if I don't spend hours prepping, just isn't going to create the immersive experience they seem to want.