this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2025
340 points (98.0% liked)

World News

50531 readers
2074 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bacon and ham sold in the UK should carry cigarette-style labels warning that chemicals in them cause bowel cancer, scientists say.

Their demand comes as they criticise successive British governments for doing “virtually nothing” to reduce the risk from nitrites in the decade since they were found to definitely cause cancer.

Saturday marks a decade since the World Health Organization in October 2015 declared processed meat declared processed meat to be carcinogenic to humans, putting it in the same category as tobacco and asbestos.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

put the cancer warnings, like smoking people will still consume it.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

A bunch of the stuff I buy has CA cancer warnings on it. When you start putting the warnings on common things, it makes the warnings meaningless...

Do any of the things I buy have a notable chance to cause caner? I have no fucking clue, because everything causes cancer in California.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

That's something I've noticed too. There's not really any information about what parts of something to avoid or what the risk is or how you'd come into contact with it, but I remember seeing it everywhere when I lived there too, and I was like

"Everything in California including California is known to the state of California to cause cancer and reproductive harm."

I'm not saying it shouldn't be there at all, but at least wish it was a bit more like Material Safety Data Sheets that gives a bit more understanding to what you're getting into by interacting with various things.

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 3 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Let me ask for fun, does toothpaste have a warning?

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

You know, I can't remember any toothpaste with that warning. So, win one for us I guess! ;p

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago

damm, i was hoping for radium toothpaste in califorina.

[–] butterycroissant@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

then again the warning would probably be so tiny we wouldn't even be able to read it

[–] butterycroissant@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Imagine brushing your teeth with a ‘may cause cancer’ warning. You think people would even care or just ignore it? ignorance is bliss is real

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

id still do it. mabye my teeth would glow.

[–] butterycroissant@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Does that come with superpowers? I'd be brushing twice a day

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

no it just makes your teeth glow, but it also makes your bones brittle

[–] butterycroissant@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

so glow teeth are guaranteed? might be worth it

[–] webp@mander.xyz 5 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah but imagine having to explain to your daughter at breakfast, "Daddy, what's that on the label? What's cancer?"

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

"Don't worry about it, honey. This is just more government bullshit, like with COVID and Brexit. The Muslims are trying to make eating pork illegal. Have an extra portion. Don't let them tell you what to do."

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This is just more government bullshit

Just like the California cancer label that is on everything, if you put this label on common shit like bacon, then yes, "it's just more government bullshit" is exactly how the vast majority of people will treat it.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I've seen the "California cancer label" line get tossed around. And its beginning to sound a lot like the "McDonalds Coffee Lawsuit" line, which was - itself - a dishonest mischaracterization of a severe injury caused by corporate neglect.

I'd say it cuts both ways. If you label everything "hazardous", you're absolutely right. The term loses all meaning. But, at the same time, if we live in a marketplace where everything is hazardous then the theory "we'll just put a label on it and let the consumer decide" of patriarchal libertarianism falls apart. What is supposed to be informative becomes little more than marketing material.

The real problem is industrial. Mass production of stuff that delivers a short-term jolt of pleasure at a long term health cost, because the manufacturers consider it more profitable than releasing products with a shorter shelf life or a lower addictive quality or a more expensive production cost.

Oops, now everything needs a label, because the folks producing this shit don't care that all their products are horrible.

[–] webp@mander.xyz 1 points 19 hours ago
[–] butterycroissant@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Makes sense, but I wonder if hiding it just makes people less aware overall Probably not a conversation for your child at breakfast though

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

I'm telling you now, if they do this, with the current political climate, people will goto farms that don't use "woke" labeling (god I hate that word)