this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
118 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

721 readers
517 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The follow up is just straight up denial mixed with severe historical illiteracy. (BTW, I was talking about the Fugitive slave act of 1793 that passed in congress).

The thread: https://bsky.app/profile/pooldude.bsky.social/post/3m3tdkkac4k2r

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] booty@hexbear.net 66 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Any country that banned slavery did it before America did. The 13th Amendment of the US constitution regulates slavery, rather than forbidding it. To this day it is legal.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Colorado recently tried to actually ban slavery by passing a state constitutional amendment but the courts decided the people didn't actually mean to ban slavery when they voted to ban slavery.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

in California they put a slavery ban up for referendum and it failed to get a majority

joker-amerikkklap

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

The Colorado one barely failed the first time but passed with a 2:1 margin on the second try, then the court decided that it was only symbolic and didn't actually apply to "prison labor"

[–] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 34 points 1 month ago

Legal, and common practice.