Politics

1126 readers

130 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

152

Opinion: Mike Johnson exploits the shutdown to hide the Epstein files (www.salon.com)

submitted 5 months ago by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There is allegedly more. During Attorney General Pam Bondi’s recent Senate hearing, for instance, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., asked about “photos of President Trump with half-naked young women.” Bondi refused to answer.

While we still don’t know the full extent of the information the FBI collected on Epstein and his buddies, Trump’s determination to bury the evidence shows he’s deeply worried about the truth getting out. There can be little doubt that Johnson knows he’s covering for a sexual abuser. This has been adjudicated twice by civil courts, with juries finding that Carroll told the truth when she said Trump sexually abused her in a department store dressing room. There is also a tape of Trump bragging about grabbing women by the genitals in a way that directly echoes Carroll’s experience.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What evidence do any of us need to see and what are we expecting to change once we see it? You listed one specific example among many where we already learned that Trump is without a doubt a rapist. Why are we talking about new information as if it's going to make a material difference in our treatment of him as a nation? We've seen the way this plays out multiple times now. The right will pretend it doesn't matter and the left will bitch about it toothlessly on the internet. That's where this ends no matter what is in those files.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Its a focusing lens. It matters and it could funnel the amount of rage in the collective US populace at the administration.

In a socialogical perspective it's incredibly important and could be the difference between descending into daily violence and stochastic terrorism to directing real change against the administration and the corruption that allowed it to happen in the first place.

From a psychological perspective, it gives an "out" or "off-ramp" (In reality they are at minimum pissed about price inflation). "Well I wanted everything he talked about, but I won't support a pedophile". Politics is teams sports apparently, if you build up momentum people will naturally abandon the perceived losing team.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Bingo. It's the off ramp people who aren't happy with Trump but support him through peer and family pressure.

For example; If and when the utterly damning evidence comes out in a fire hose, I'm taking every opportunity to yell at my MAGA neighbor that he supports kiddie fuckers.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Yup. I am making Grand Old Pedophile signs and putting them up in my yard the day it breaks and not taking them down until this administration is over.