this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
102 points (98.1% liked)
Slop.
713 readers
202 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I really don't get the confusion. The Frieren demons are as close to ontological evil as you can get while still having some of them be characters.
Of course you can always go a step more post-modernist and threat all characterizations of evil as war propaganda internal to the fiction. But I don't really get the vibe.
You just noted that being "ontologically evil" is contradictory to being a person and you are still confused? Why are you shocked that racists are running away with a setting were genocide and racism is "justified"?
Yes it is a justified-speciecide story in its text. Explicitly. As in the author is aware that the question would come up and answered it.
You understand that that's also a pretty good description of the way colonial powers depicted indigenous people, right? Like it's the real world way that people were convinced to commit atrocities against actual minority groups.
As I've said, it's possible to read this as war propaganda internal to the story. I don't think that's the authorial intent at least with where the story has gone so far.
Of course critiques can go beyond authorial intent.