Like I said in another comment to another user, One's expression of radicalism is often ELEVATED by one's reach, and one's reach can be defined by one's radicalism, that's been my point from the start, far from being "unrelated" or even "equivalent" they interact with each other

Reach helps with the radicalization of other people, one's personal radicalism can define HOW you use your reach, this describes Hasan Piker perfectly, I'm not saying radicalism and reach are the same thing

I'm been saying they can be linked, they can have a relationship, radicalism without any degree of reach is simply someone talking to themself, it's still radical, but it's not useful is it?

I'm pointing at an interaction between two things and the resulting utility and making a comparison, frankly I'm shocked how this went over so many people's heads

[–] MizuTama@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago

I'm at work and responding from my inbox not the thread so if you addressed this somewhere else I haven't seen it and I'm sorry if you've had to repeat yourself because of that.

This comment I fully agree with.