this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
137 points (100.0% liked)

electoralism

22233 readers
7 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Ok, then don't conflate those two very different things.

HOLY SHIT, we have to conflate them, because ONE, is useless, without the OTHER, hence my use of the word COM-BIN-NATION, I swear this site sometimes

As for the so-called idealism of having radical positions without the material action to back it up... There are people working in volunteer soup kitchens and spending their free time organizing their community as best they can and supporting the vulnerable within it, and they do this because of the radical ML or even anarchist convictions that they hold.

God have mercy, everyone's a liberal at the end of the day.....HEY, you know what would really help those people struggling in their soup kitchens? POWER, actualized POWER WITH REACH, the ability to have your politics normalized whether it be anarchist or ML, and you know what's a powerful vector of actualization and normalization? That's right, THE MEDIA, and you know who we have on our side who can normalize our politics despite his "so close yet so far away" takes? That's right, Hasan Piker, a piped piper handed to you on a silver platter, who through his advocacy can inspire and send streams of newly radicalized people to those soups kitchens of yours

But that's all meaningless because "nice house"? Well how austere and noble, didn't know the poverty cult had real adherents

They are inarguably more radical both in terms of their actions and their beliefs than Hasan is.

Confidence, normalization, scalability, inspiration, popularity, cultural buy-in, POWER, are these concepts poisonous to your radicalism? Are we in a struggle to change systems or glorify band-aids?

[–] SeizeTheBeans@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're going off the rails here comrade. I don't know if it's because you can't handle it being pointed out that a word you were using doesn't mean the thing you were using it to mean or if you really just hate the fact that Hasan on his best days barely crosses the line from liberal to leftist and is simply in no way considered a radical by anyone who is versed in genuinely radical (such as Marxist Leninist) theory, that is making you feel the need to pick nonsensical fights with everyone, but have at it I guess.

But no, we don't have to conflate two words (use them as if they mean the same thing) that have completely different meanings in order to be effective. A close example: we need to have principles and we need to take action if we want to make positive material change. That doesn't mean principles and action are the same thing and is sure as hell doesn't mean we need to pretend they are the same thing in order to be effective leftists.

Confidence, normalization, scalability, inspiration, popularity, cultural buy-in, POWER, are these concepts poisonous to your radicalism?

Well, let's take one of those: normalization. What is being normalized? If what's being normalized is the idea that leftists need to vote for Democrat presidential candidates in order to stop those dastardly Republicans at any cost (especially when those Democrats are actively conducting genocide) then yes, that concept is poisonous to my radicalism. I would say similar things about the rest of your word list.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You're going off the rails here comrade

I'm not going off any rails, I'm growing increasingly annoyed at obtuse parasocial nonsense employed for the purposes of trashing the largest leftist voice in the country and for what? To pretend you (a forum user) has more motion than the largest funder of the Amazon labor union or the most popular pro-Palestine advocate in the US?

I don't know if it's because you can't handle it being pointed out that a word you were using doesn't mean the thing you were using it to mean or if you really just hate the fact that Hasan on his best days barely crosses the line from liberal to leftist and is simply in no way considered a radical by anyone who is versed in genuinely radical (such as Marxist Leninist) theory

If you're gonna talk shit, the least you could do is know something about the person you're trashing

Well, let's take one of those: normalization. What is being normalized?

SOCIALISM, MARXISM, PRO-PALESTINE POLITICS, yes I'll take all of that, think I give a fuck about his electoral takes, I need him to radicalize people toward socialism and he's doing his job well

I would say similar things about the rest of your word list.

Of course you would, you want the left to stay motionless

[–] SeizeTheBeans@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Alright, let's look at this honestly because I've read many of your comments over the years and know you're better than this. Right now you are grossly misrepresenting the things people (in this case me) are saying. I sincerely don't know if you're aware you're doing this and just want to score points or if you are in an emotional state that is distorting what you think I'm saying. It seems like the latter, and that is what I mean by going off the rails.

I'm growing increasingly annoyed at obtuse parasocial nonsense

What parasocial nonsense have I expressed in this conversation, from your perspective?

for the purposes of trashing the largest leftist voice in the country

In what way am I trashing Hasan? I literally said I am grateful he is out there and that while I don't like everything he does, I think he is a force for good in the world. I agreed with you that as far as outreach and spreading and popularizing leftism, that he almost certainly has done more than people here have done.

To pretend you (a forum user) has more motion than the largest funder of the Amazon labor union

What is motion? Where did I pretend I had more of it than Hasan?

If you're gonna talk shit, the least you could do is know something about the person you're trashing

I haven't been doing anything that could remotely be called "talking shit" unless saying "Hasan is not radical" by the standards of nearly anyone on this website is "talking shit." To the contrary, I've been saying that Hasan is undeniably a net good. As for what I know about him, everything I've said is well within reason to say given what I do know about Hasan. I have said nothing about him that is not perfectly commensurate with my non-expert but more than average person on the street's knowledge of who he is.

[your link]

I'm glad he is talking to and is friends with someone else who I will take your word is a well-read Marxist Leninist. It doesn't matter though, I contend that someone who endorses Democrats, especially genocidal presidential candidates, someone who is as concerned and supportive of one half of the uni-party posing as a two-party state kayfabe politics as I've personally seen him to be, that person is simply not a radical leftist and that no actual radical leftist would claim him as one.

Of course you would, you want the left to stay motionless

Great. Nice little jab of meaningless nonsense, accusing me of something that doesn't even parse, let alone related in any way to anything I said. That's the way to stick it to your opponents! Come on, what is the point of doing that, really?

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I get what you're saying, but I can't help it, I have to be pedantic here because words matter. How radical a person is is not dependent on how big their platform or loud their voice is, how many people they've exposed to leftist thought, or even how much material change they can affect or may have brought about

This is how you began the conversation, this is incoherent; according to you in terms of what is radical, actions don't matter, radicalizing people doesn't matter, exposing people to leftist thought, who cares, loudest anti-genocide voice in the country, platforming countless Palestinian voices, teaching 50,000 people the concept of social murder....etc

"Tried your best kid, BUT THAT AIN'T RADICAL", that's your take huh?

No, what apparently what only really matters is a person's take on electoralism and the concept of entryism, that's how we here at Hexbear judge what is or isn't radical, absolute nonsense, is democrat derangement syndrome a thing now?

And you wonder why I might be annoyed and put off, the loudest anti-genocide voice in the country is disqualified from the vaunted halls of Hexbear radicalism because he encouraged his viewers to neither vote for or against Harris, while still trashing Harris the whole time, unforgivable

End of the day, this shit still boils down to 2024 for all of you

[–] chloroken@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You are truly hung up on semantics. Hasan is not radical in ML terms but does have significant impact and reach. You are literally conflating concepts, as it's been explained to you several times. We recognize you're claiming that in order for a radical to have impact, they must have reach, but this is not the point. The point is that calling Hasan a radical is bizarre given his Democrat entryism even if he does good under the banner of Marxism.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The point is that calling Hasan a radical is bizarre given his Democrat entryism even if he does good under the banner of Marxism.

And there it is, and that's why all of you are dumb, sorry but pro-Palestine radicalism boosted by his REACH, doesn't stop being radical just because of his takes on electoralism, and second of all his electoral takes for the last 8 months have been about how the democrat party is shit and is doomed, while still being rightfully skeptical of third party emergence

Regardless that doesn't trump his radicalism concerning Palestine and how that radicalism is elevated by his reach, my entire point the whole goddamn time

[–] chloroken@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not dumb. I think you're wrong and arguing out of emotion.

I'll state it plainly before leaving you to your devices: one's degree of radical is unrelated to one's reach. You are conflating concepts. Also, Hasan is not radical in ML terms.

Good bye.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

one's degree of radical is unrelated to one's reach

One's expression of radicalism is often ELEVATED by one's reach, and one's reach can be defined by one's radicalism, that's been my point from the start, far from being "unrelated" they interact with each other, welcome to the real world Neo

Elevating and defining each other, concepts sometimes do that, of course this conceptual interaction is obvious, but you all want to pretend you don't know how to follow a basic logic chain, because at the end of that chain you'd have to hand it to Hasan, and we can't have that

No, we have to pretend this forum is more radical and impactful than aipac's number one target and the literal face of American left radicalism

Why? Because he said vote once

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's wild how you are the person calling others "parasocial" lmao

And literally no one is doing this here:

No, we have to pretend this forum is more radical and impactful than aipac's number one target and the literal face of American left radicalism

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Seriously get a grip, people in this thread literally said Hasan isn't "radical" cause of his pro-Harris electoral takes and that he's friends with and platforms Zionists, people don't lie this much about a streamer (they apparently don't watch) unless they got some parasocial hate boner

That's what's so obnoxious about this anti-Hasan clique of yours, you all dogpile, you intentionally misinterpret EVERYTHING SOMEONE SAYS, and then when someone pushes back a little, suddenly it's "get over yourself", "haha crash out" and "you like seeing homeless people suffer"

When it comes to Hasan, you weirdos act like Destiny stans, it's gross and unhinged, we get it, you're all podcast millennials who hate streaming culture, stop making that everyone else's problem

[–] LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

you intentionally misinterpret EVERYTHING SOMEONE SAYS

When it comes to Hasan, you weirdos act like Destiny stans

it’s gross and unhinged, we get it, you’re all podcast millennials

Seriously get a grip

Have you ever heard the phrase "every accusation a confession"?

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago

I don't trash pro-Palestinian voices, you dipshits do, using anti-Hasan talking points straight out of the Destiny Subreddit

You can't even see the arguments I'm making, you're just reacting like a kid called out at recess, "nah uh, you!", your clique only has semantics, misinterpretation, and dirtbag accusations to lop

And for what? Cause I handed it to a streamer lmao, so yeah I'm not gonna play nice with nonsense and dogpiles, kick rocks

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And there it is, and that's why all of you are dumb

picard

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Oh no, another emoji scared The obnoxious radlib faction of Hexbear is mad at me now powercry-2

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago

Keep crashing out