this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
64 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1309 readers
39 users here now

A tech news sub for communists

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Faux@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A Chinese capitalist asshole is a capitalist asshole that can be controlled. A German non-profit is an actor that's totally out of control.

A piece of free software that's developed by an organization under control of a socialist state would be better, yes. But with what is already there, I'm not surprised what was the lesser evil from perspective of CPC.

[–] sudo_halt@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

"Control"? It's free software the CPC could make their own endorsed fork and just roll with it

Multiple Chinese companies make their own Linux distro for national consumption, there is even precedent for this

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, probably the consultants on IT for the CPC are outdated if there are any. WPS is just the norm there so i can understand why they went for that, the owner likely is part of the CPC too so there is that nuance too.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Sudo if they used LibreOffice this then they would just be mocked for not using something made in China it would send a different message than what is intended. It's symbolic, saying China does not need western devs

[–] Faux@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Yes, it would be cool if CPC made their own fork of LibreOffice and endorsed it instead if WPC.

But they don't atm and endorsing LibreOffice risks endorsing a hostile actor that could use it against PRC.

[–] Faux@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Also, about Linux distros, Huawei recently made their own independent OS with their own kernel.