this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
102 points (100.0% liked)

Transgender

995 readers
52 users here now

Overview:

The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.


Rules:

  1. Keep discussions civil.

  2. Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.

  3. No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.

Shinigami Eyes:

Extension for Quickly Spotting Transphobes Online.

Shinigami Eyes

spoiler iphone: unofficial workaround to use extension Install the Orion browser then add the extension. :::

Related:!lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone

!intersex@lemmy.blahaj.zone


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MarriedCavelady50@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 week ago (3 children)

His reason was preventing rising healthcare costs. But the drugs are cheap relatively, and Washington already has a similar law with no rise in healthcare costs.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Increasing healthcare costs, for fucking real??? Yeah man, the medication I’ve been on for the past 15+ years is going to be cheaper if I get it month by month instead of a year’s supply at once. This is the most stupid ass excuse I’ve heard. ‘I can’t do math and think you’re going to stop transitioning in under a year’ as a defense. Pisses me off.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let me clarify his stance for you: it's to not increase Healthcare costs for everyone else. He doesn't care about your Healthcare costs.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

It isn’t possible for a medication I am already on and have been on for 15+ years to increase health costs for everyone else.

Also notice he's vetoing a bill that was sent from the state Senate. This man is standing up and saying "Nuh-uh, I know better" then dropping this...

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

WA's law only applies to healthcare plans started or renewed in 2026 or later. HRT is cheap, so the costs should be minimal. But any costs this law could have haven't happened yet.

[–] BipedalPossum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What is the name of the Washington law? I'm interested and would love to do some reading on it :)

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's HB 1971 More details on the legislature's bill tracker.

Summary as Enacted:

Health plans issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2026, including health plans issued to public and school employees, that include coverage for prescription hormone therapy must provide reimbursement for a 12-month refill of covered hormone therapy obtained at one time by the enrollee. The 12-month refill requirement only applies to prescription hormone therapy that can be safely stored at room temperature