Privacy

42437 readers

1204 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

If it ask for your phone number its not private. (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 days ago by lunatique@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

130 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Nowadays, a majority of apps require you to sign up with your email or even worse your phone number. If you have a phone number attached to your name, meaning you went to a cell service/phone provider, and you gave them your ID, then no matter what app you use, no matter how private it says it is, it is not private. There is NO exception to this. Your identity is instantly tied to that account.

Signal is not private. I recommend Simplex or another peer to peer onion messaging app. They don't require email or phone number. So as long as you protect your IP you are anonymous

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dysprosium@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Alright I think I know what you mean, but I'm still not sure we're actually on the same page regarding encryption.

If a company is forced to do whatever ths government commands it to do, that's only valid within certain constraints.

For example, the company cannot be forced to grow wings snd fly to thr heavens. That's physically impossible.

Similarly, it also cannot provide the decrypted messages of its users because it (like Signal) does not have the KEYS that are absolutely 100% necessary for decrypting the encrypted messages of its users. So, again, it's physically impossible to hand over either the keys or the decrypted messages.

However, there is one remedy that Signal CAN do, if somehow forced. That's changing the Signal program. It certainly can push an update that sends Signal the keys for decryption.

However, at that point, the source code at github doesn't match the compiled binary of the program anymore, and very good chance people would notice, and thereby people would lose trust in Signal.

I'm not sure about the examples you gave about the government being successful in obtaining user details of a company. Were those details encrypted as well? Was the source code publically available? Was the program popular?

[–] unexpected@forum.guncadindex.com 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Just the fact that signal can, and we can assume, does share all the other data outside of the actual message content is a big deal.

You're just not going to go to the extra effort of requiring a phone number and storing that information if your business model isn't dependent on selling that information to parties who would want it. That takes a lot more effort than just giving out username/password pairs.

[–] dysprosium@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago

No there is good reason for requiring a phone number, it's to reduce spam accounts.

Of course they can sell your phone number but that's not the only good reason for requiring one.