this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
37 points (93.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
8719 readers
134 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It seems like ordinary citizens can nominate local delegates that are then screened by a commission run by the party. The elected (party approved) delegates then vote on policy. This system can certainly give an illusion of democracy but ultimately the party is curating all political discourse by only allowing for party approved delegates to become electable in addition to exerting absolute control over local media.
In more ideal circumstances, delegates would not be screened for party loyalty, such that if other (less ruling party favorable) perspectives became popular, a new coalition could eventually accumulate the political power to form an opposition party to the ruling one.
In other words, I think we should be skeptical towards the notion that a one party state can be 'democratic'.
Lmao this is just chauvinism. What gives you the right to decide or criticize the path of nations that have been under siege by US imperialism?
The PCC isn't a shadowy cabal running Cuba from the shadows, it's a mass worker org, with about 5% of the total population in it. As a socialist system, it needs to defend against outside influence, and of course a socialist system is going to limit capitalist press. It's ultimately a people-driven political system that surpasses bourgeois multiparty systems.
They are under constant aggression and embargoes from the genocidal US Empire, you have no leg to stand on.
Anyone trying to push their viewpoint is propaganda, yes. Propaganda doesn't mean its wrong, climate activists are propagandists for a good cause, with good information.
Either way, you're comically wrong. Socialist countries like Cuba have far lower wealth disparity, and have better metrics when compared to capitalist peer countries. Cuba in particular has higher life expectancy than the US, even, thanks to comprehensive medical care based on prevention over profit. The socialist system increased life expectancy by a third, and over tripled literacy rates post-revolution. The people overwhelmingly support the system, and correctly blame the US Empire's blockade on them having to pay the highest import fees of any country due to shipping costs, when they could just get goods from Florida without a blockade.
You equate the systemic brutality and plunder of capitalism with the necessary defenses a worker-run system maintains. You claim you're used to capitalist propaganda, which is true, but you parrot it anyways when it comes to Cuba. The Cuban people replaced the fascist slaver colony under Batista with a socialist system run by and for the people. The US Empire was initially on hesitent terms, until Castro implemented land reform, giving the peasants the land the slavers held beforehand and nationalizing businesses. Then, the US Empire launched terrorist attacks like the Bay of Pigs.
When you just parrot claims equating socialist systems with capitalist ones in terms of how they serve the people, you just show ignorance on the subject matter. I urge you to actually read up on Cuba, which has an extremely positive reputation internationally outside of western, imperialist countries trying to turn it back into a sugar colony. Even western media reports on how Fidel Castro is a heroic figure in the global south. Don't pretend the international community all agrees with US Imperial propaganda.
The US bombed civilians from the sky for decades, tried to murder their head of state hundreds of times, sponsored mercenary invasions and to this day maintains a military blockade of supplies to the island.
At what point does material reality fit into your assessments?
You are completely in your mind palace spinning yarns about the outside world that only sound reasonable with zero context.