this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
152 points (99.4% liked)

Slop.

748 readers
397 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"capitalism can't be defined"

I HATE LIBERALS I HATE LIBERALS AAAAAAAAAA

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

From Orthodoxy by GK Chesterton:

But what we suffer from to-day is humility in the wrong place. Modesty has moved from the organ of ambition. Modesty has settled upon the organ of conviction; where it was never meant to be. A man was meant to be doubtful about himself, but undoubting about the truth; this has been exactly reversed. Nowadays the part of a man that a man does assert is exactly the part he ought not to assert -himself. The part he doubts is exactly the part he ought not to doubt-the Divine Reason. Huxley preached a humility content to learn from Nature. But the new sceptic is so humble that he doubts if he can even learn.

Thus we should be wrong if we had said hastily that there is no humility typical of our time. The truth is that there is a real humility typical of our time; but it so happens that it is practically a more poisonous humility than the wildest prostrations of the ascetic. The old humility was a spur that prevented a man from stopping; not a nail in his boot that prevented him from going on. For the old humility made a man doubtful about his efforts, which might make him work harder. But the new humility makes a man doubtful about his aims, which will make him stop working altogether.

Obviously we should be skeptical of Chesterton for a variety of reasons but I think there's something pretty resonant here about these kinds of moments where people plug their ears in and convince themselves that the real world is unknowable when it obviously is knowable if you try for a second. Obviously capitalism can be defined!

[โ€“] purpleworm@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago

A version of this is, to me, one of the two worst things about dem-aligned intellectuals (along with "everyone to the left of me is really to the right"): They act like the very idea or attitude of believing that something is true is sophomorism, unless of course it's liberal dogma. It's like, aside from everyone needing to agree with liberalism, political ideology is a game of show-and-tell where you share what your personal lifestylist fashion is with others and they share theirs and you all clap for each other as you profess to values that are barbarously contraposed. Acting like someone could be wrong is gauche and a sign that you're immature.