this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
202 points (99.0% liked)

World News

50226 readers
2060 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DreamAccountant@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a great reason not to raise wild animals in captivity.

They'll be held as hostages by corpo scum.

"Give me money, or I'll kill 30 whales. Ahahahah! They're mine, and I can do whatever I want! AHAHAAHAH! Hail HR! Hail HR!"

That's not fiction. That's the story.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"we're closing. We cannot afford to keep these whales with no staff and no land. We want to move them to another habitat which has agreed to keep these animals which cannot be released."

"No because they could maybe be mistreated."

"They WILL be neglected here and the people buying the land will need them gone. It's euthanasia or transport. Or you adopt them."

Barring a time machine to stop the park from opening in 1961, that's the options.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The option is right there in the article:

Under provincial law, Ontario has the power to seize the whales to ensure their safety – recouping any costs incurred when the park is sold.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

How much do you wanna bet that any fines for killing the whales will be substantially cheaper than relocation, so the park will do that and just eat the fine rather than risk the province confiscate the whales and then charge them later?