politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
MAGA is a bunch of different groups with mutually conflicting agendas. Libertarians hate tariffs, anti-vaxers don't like that Operation Warp Speed did its job, and Christian Nationalists hate just about everyone. What keeps them from fighting each other is Trump, and Trump alone.
That's how cults of personality often work. As soon as the personality in questions dies, all this infighting shatters the group. Rarely, a cult of personality can convert into a cult of ideas, but it's very difficult to pull off. Mormons did when Joseph Smith died, but for every success story, there's 100 more little cults you've never heard of that never worked out after the leader died or went to jail.
They cannot replace him. They can try, but it's almost certainly going to fail. Trying to replace him before he dies would only make the fracture even more severe, because now his name becomes a rallying cry for the "true believers".
Which is why all the factions are trying to get their agenda advanced as quickly as possible before he croaks. The techno-feudalist side had the advantage with their boy JD poised to take over but removing him is much more politcally viable for the Christian nationalists in congress
I totally agree with all of this about Trump's voters, and at this point I'm 100% sure that if you beamed us back into the 2024 Election, Kamala Harris would win by a landslide.
BUT I think the White House itself is rather unified. Sure, the Republicans may never have the support of the majority of the USA, but they don't need to win another election. All the Republicans need is control of the military, which they can stuff full of young, hateful men who have been groomed into rage and thoughtlessly following orders... which is already underway.
JD Vance, Stephen Miller, Kristi Noem, Kash Patel, Peter Thiel -- they're all united in their Christo-fascist beliefs. Hell, if Trump had mental capacity to do more than sign the documents placed in front of him, he would probably be the biggest wrench with their plans. In his first term, Donald Trump openly countered Mike Pence's statements on key Republican issues like gun rights. In this administration, Elon Musk was the most "out there" from the rest in being a libertarian 4chan incel manchild, but he's now entirely out of the scene.
The MAGA voter base may never be as supportive of the regime as they were in 2024, but that's not going to matter unless that fractured voting base pulls off an effective insurrection.
America will never vote a woman as President. Woman and not white? No fucking way. We like them pale, male and stale, preferably rotting.
It's not just about voting. They need to rule the whole narrative around them. Otherwise, members of Congress start building their own factions to oppose specific things, and Democrats will strategically ally themselves to one or another on specific bills.
Literally nobody is in favor of Trump's tariffs besides Trump. That's him driving it, personally. There isn't even a real base for that beyond "whatever Trump wants, he gets".
They can't pursue their agenda without some kind of populist support. They need a base that will automatically back them, and then have Enlightened Centrists insist that base has something useful to say. Voting doesn't play into it.
I really doubt Congress is going to start forming factions. Republicans are all in it for the grift, except for a handful of looneys that really believe what they say (and, to their credit, are working on the Epstein files). Most Republican Congressmen do not care about their representees, definitely not enough to stick their own necks out. Two Republicans dissented on the "Big Beautiful Bill" purely based on spending concerns, which is the entire Tea Party Republican viewpoint. Two.
Your scenario also assumes that support of Congress is needed. The White House already has their Gestapo, ICE, as well as the actual US Military. They've broken Supreme Court orders, some of them unanimous 9-0 decisions.
I do believe the White House will continue to play along with Congress for as long as Congress obeys, them -- just to preserve the veil of normalcy. Should Congress actually attempt to impede the regime, they'll be ignored, or if deemed preferable, taken out.
We've seen the military attack citizens, seen ICE arrest members of Congress, and we've seen MAGA hold state legislators hostage. The same country that tormented innocent civilians in nations like Iraq, has turned its guns on its own. To assume that any legal action can stop the regime is to utterly ignore reality. There was nothing legal about George W. Bush's invasion of Iraq or Afghanistan. The US Military does not follow the law, it follows orders. The Constitution has been shredded in every sense but literal. The only way one can believe we have any protection is to presume that "it would never happen here"... in the face of "it" happening here.
It already has factions. They couldn't even pick a Speaker of the House without causing a ruckus. Republicans are united around Trump, and only Trump. They can't decide if the Speaker should be more libertarian, more Christian Nationalist, or just straight up MAGA faithful.
Only because everyone says "let Trump do whatever he wants". Nobody else can take up that mantle. Someone will try, probably Vance. He's an idiot who doesn't have anything like Trump's ability to appeal to a certain kind of person, and will fail. Hard.
They still had to play the game where Congress authorizes it. It was only "illegal" in the sense that international law forbids it, and international law isn't quite as clear cut about enforcement mechanisms. It's more like a series of agreements between nation states, and those agreements can get tossed. Especially when the guy with the biggest hammer (the US) decides they can be tossed. Nobody was going to do anything substantive against the US for that.
I'm not assuming anything about the Constitution whatsoever. At its most basic, politics is coalitions of people who try to achieve certain goals. Voting and a constitutional republic are just means we've traditionally used for structuring that. Coalitions form without any other structure being present, and can fall apart when a central leader goes away. In a scenario where Trump dies and Congress is still around, Congressional Republicans will fight each other trying to be on top. No reason to assume they will form around a new leader at all.
I recall that happening, but I would note that the division in the Republican Party was between MAGA and the "Tea Party" fiscal conservatives, the latter of which have all been branded "Republican In Name Only" and cast out. This division was also why the MAGA plan to refuse to certify the Electoral Vote on Jan 6th, 2021 failed. I'm not talking about the insurrection -- there was a genuine argument being made to try to overturn the electoral votes of several key states that voted for Biden, with passionate arguments made for and against completely rigging the election in Trump's favor.
That speaker debacle was during Biden's term, after the ousting of Kevin McCarthy specifically because Kevin McCarthy was one of those fiscal conservatives. The Republicans did eventually elect Mike Johnson, and I don't see him getting kicked out any time soon.
We can not cling to this vision that the Republican Party will collapse in on itself. It's a nice thought, but us waiting around is exactly what our rulers want. There are US Military soldiers and secret police agents on our streets right now -- Today -- trafficking people right now. Every day that we continue to play this routine, participating in the corporations and institutions that engineered and empowered this crisis, the USA and the corporations and the Christian Nationalists all get what they want.
A General Strike could put some strain between the corporations and the politicians, but that's a movement that each of us must partake in. Right now, big business including Silicon Valley, as well as the Christian Nationalists, are quite content with the status-quo.
Sone of y'all never been in a cult, and it shows.
You're missing how much these people all hate each other. I'm not counting on the Republican party collapsing. I'm saying it's inevitable. If you understand how cults of personality work, it's quite obvious.
I don't consider it the best possible outcome, though. What probably happens next is closer to European-style democratic socialism. I'm an anarchist, and I consider that to be weak sauce.