I was looking for images online to create an agitprop meme till I somehow stumbled upon this depravity.
"apolitical" Libs really think that they can put up a "NOT POLITICAL" force-field and expect "apolitical" responses in "apolitical" discussions. Then they proceed to espouse the very racist, eugenicist, et. tal. ideas that they claim to be against this whole time.
Best-of Reddit replies:
Saudigate LOL (and "what are we, a bunch of asians" and all the usual racist shit Reddit casually allows in their decrepit site)..
ok fash
This is obviously deeply unserious, as usual. It's pretty easy to "prove" that there are "more immigrants than natives" by just taking a random screenshot of brown people walking down the street. The city at 1st place with the highest proportion of immigrants in Europe is Brussels, sitting at ~35%, then Frankfurt at 2nd place at 29%, if we're to believe Eurostat. It shouldn't be hard understand then, that you will see more white people in those cities even after the so-called mass immigration.
It is not, as far as reality is concerned. The "UN Program" mentioned, from what I can see from just the title and preface alone, discusses whether immigrants can mitigate Global North declining populations... History, to these libs, of course started in 2015 when Moroccans, Lybians, Syrians and Iraqis just totally-out-of-nowhere decided it would be radicool to immigrate to Europe and asked Big Europe to teleport them all to Europe, then afterwards proceeded with spreading their ebil gommunist Sharia ideals of replacing the hapless white people who didn't see it coming.
Settlers, colonialists invading and occupying various Indigenous lands:👍
Immigrants escaping wars, famines and economic downturns as a result of rent-seeking debt traps, etc.. all engineered by the imperial West: "Mein Fuhrer, we should enact population control to address the concerns over the fall of the Aryan race!"
damn.. I spent more time on this post than what I originally ventured out to do :/..
And also I'm failing to see the problem. Who gives a shit where your ancestors came from or where they were born? If they got something you like about them and vice versa then a happy couple (or polycule) is made. Any offspring that result will likely also have whatever positive traits made the first couple/polycule successful in the first place.
The thing about human evolution in particular is that this doesn't really work - there is a level of variability at the population level that means you can't really do trait selection like this for
For a real life example, schizophrenia is a highly heritable condition. Europe in the 20 the century and Nazi Germany to the greatest extent sterilised or murdered almost everyone diagnosed with schizophrenia, but rates returned to normal within a couple of generations
But yes you're entirely right, definitionally everyone alive is a descendent of a thousand generations of bipedal survivors
However to be sufficiently (((racist))) you have to sort of ignore the common origins of all life
Fair, though I'm admittedly grossly oversimplifying things to make the point of the uselessness of selecting for ancestral geographic descent.
And in that regard we're all ancestrally geographically African ^^ Always valuable to remind idiot racists of this