this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
374 points (97.9% liked)

Open Source

41172 readers
525 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Good video, very much worth watching despite the length. New UI will look something like this:

with an option for a more classic look.

Looks like an enourmous UX improvement too, and a rewrite to QT and eliminating a lot of technical debt will make development faster.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

And what exactly does Tenacity bring to the table other than a name replace across the code-base?

The non-destructive editing and realtime effects alone are a huge jump in capability between the current and old versions of Audacity, and that's before we even discuss UI improvements

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

From what I could tell when I looked into it after a comment someone left on !nebula@lemmy.world, some people were very upset at the privacy implications of Audacity adding an update detection mechanism (which can be turned off, and which is not included at all in the default build if you build it yourself).

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are people are actually upset about an auto update feature? A feature that has been pretty standard in programs for a very long time?

I understood some of the upset when they added telemetry, but auto-update?

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 25 points 2 days ago

Not even auto-update. Just auto detect updates. Then you go and download it yourself manually.

Auto-update-detection meant that the software was calling out to a remote server, so they updated the TOS to reflect that, and people got upset.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

afaik most distros and flathub package it without that for obvious reasons

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 2 days ago

(for package management, not weird concerns like “they’re adding an entire http library to audacity for this so they must be in the process of using it for something else”)

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ardour is milea ahead on all that anyway. Tenacity is a simple multi-channel recorder. That's all it needs to be

Hard agree! It fills a really specific use case, for ease of use, relatively simple projects (though like any simple tech, artists gonna art and make something massive lol).

Aurduor and the like (I jumped over to Reaper) are truly excellent options for more intense projects.