this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
162 points (99.4% liked)

Slop.

831 readers
408 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I think actually it's cognitive dissonance (because the two beliefs are conflicting)

EDIT: Actually I just realized you probably meant the original post, not the guy you were directly responding to

[–] WildWeezing420@hexbear.net 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

No I’m responding directly. The purposeful conflation of terms to muddy definitions and confuse the argument is called equivocation

Cognitive dissonance is a psychology phenomenon where people separate contradicting ideas they hold and place a barrier between them in their mind to avoid ever thinking of both at the same time because it causes pain, the same type of mental discomfort we experience when we are confronted with being wrong about something.

Kind of the opposite of what they were discussing, where multiple things get shoved into one amorphous blob.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago

Ah, thanks, I misunderstood you