this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)

micromobility - Bikes, scooters, boards: Whatever floats your goat, this is micromobility

3549 readers
5 users here now

Ebikes, bicycles, scooters, skateboards, longboards, eboards, motorcycles, skates, unicycles, heelies, or an office chair: Whatever floats your goat, this is all things micromobility!

"Transportation using lightweight vehicles such as bicycles or scooters, especially electric ones that may be borrowed as part of a self-service rental program in which people rent vehicles for short-term use within a town or city.

micromobility is seen as a potential solution to moving people more efficiently around cities"

Recall warnings available here.

Feel free to also check out

!utilitycycling@slrpnk.net

!bikewrench@lemmy.world

!bikecommuting@lemmy.world

!bikepacking@lemmy.world

!electricbikes@lemmy.world

!bicycle_touring@lemmy.world

!notjustbikes@feddit.nl

!longboard@lemmy.world

It's a little sad that we need to actually say this, but:

Don't be an asshole or you will be permanently banned.

Respectful debate is totally OK, criticizing a product is fine, but being verbally abusive will not be tolerated.

Focus on discussing the idea, not attacking the person.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ultimately, this lawsuit boils down to, according to Strava, Garmin’s use of features on its own Garmin Connect platform that mirror patented features on Strava, specifically the segments that have become commonplace for so many cyclists and runners to the point of ubiquity, and the use of heatmaps (or ‘user preference maps’, in the patent documentation).

Petents need to go away.

[–] zbych@szmer.info 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Heatmaps are much older than any fckin Strava's patents.

[–] pqh@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah DC Rainmaker’s video was filled with evidence that Garmin did heat maps first and Strava’s patent application came well after, long enough after that either Strava wasn’t first or, if they were first they failed to file within the de facto one year grace period. And given that Strava has let another decade go by before filing suit there’s no way a judge will be sympathetic to Strava pleading that there were special circumstances that led to the application being unusually late.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Patents don't care who came first. Patents dont even care if the thing you're patenting exists. And, currently, it seems quite easy to buy a judge's decision.