Risa: Your Home Away from Spacedock
Welcome to Risa
All the pleasure of shore leave, none of the holodeck glitches.
Rule 1 — Be Civil, Not Klingon
This is a vacation planet, not the neutral zone.
- No harassment, brigading, or trolling
- No bigotry
- Keep the banter playful, not hostile
Rule 2 — No Prohibited Cargo
Some things aren’t welcome aboard.
- No spam or scams
- No porn or sexually explicit content
- No illegal content
- NSFW memes must be properly tagged
Rule 3 — Keep It Trek
Posts should be Star Trek memes or Trek-adjacent humor.
- Crossovers are fine
- Low-effort “unrelated” memes may be spaced out the nearest airlock
Rule 4 — Gatekeeping Belongs in a Black Hole
You’re welcome to have your own opinions on what counts as “real” Star Trek but forcing your view on others or pretending it’s the only valid one? That’s not the Starfleet way.
Everyone’s Trek is valid, from TOS purists to Lower Decks shitposters, and you don't get to dictate what is real or not for everyone.
If you see a post that violates the rules, or that doesn't inspire Jamaharon, report it so the mods can handle it.
Otherwise grab a horga’hn, order a Risan Mai Tai, and enjoy your shore leave.
view the rest of the comments
nothing in the link seems to describe the misinformation; only that there was misinformation.
My apologies, I thought I had edited that original post to add another link. This one.
The tl;dr of that would be that the political terms one government uses is not universal. A Canadian was talking about Canadian politics on a post about Canadian politicians made to /c/World@Lemmy.world, their World News community. The mod in question, Jordan, removed a comment that had said a particular person was not a Member of Government. This is a term that is equivalent to Member of Administration. Jordan, unaware of this, removed the dude claiming that "It is misinformation to call this person not a Member of Government". It was not misinformation, just a misunderstanding. What became active misinformation was Jordan doubling down for months, even doing so in the major call out post that I made a couple hours after an admin specifically said that he was wrong.
Misinformation could apply to either the constant insistence that the user was engaging in misinformation as Jordan is definitely trying to reframe that reality but also the insistence that the term does not exist. It's an American pushing an American narrative of a Canadian situation and that shit sent me over the fucking edge.
I, a Canadian, was part of a similar discussion. I, like JL, thought that stance was crazy. Unlike him, I did some research, saw that was a common definition in Canada, so clarified what I meant in my original comment and then stopped using that term for Canadian elected officials. I'm not sure why he chose his route.
Because he is incapable of admitting fault. He is a narcissistic American with his head shoved so far up his ass he could use his belly button as a porthole.
strange hill to die on
Someone is going to.
That being said, no. Don't really think that being actively against misinformation and moderator abuse is that strange of a hill to die on
Sometimes when people are knee-deep in controversies, they forget to make them properly explainable to outsiders. I did a little deep dive to find this post.