this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
39 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
23167 readers
134 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It'd be catastrophic.
It sounds like you're mostly thinking of plastic containers though, which... well it'd still have to be carefully phased, because food comes in those, and it'd be better to still allow a little plastic film for safety seals, but yeah, it'd be entirely possible to switch back to bottles and cans. It'd probably cost like $0.10 more to produce per item or something trivial though, so corporations would never allow it.
A policy I like to daydream about is, after ending CO2 emissions, massively subsidizing lumber production until it makes sense to make disposable containers out of wood. All the wooden garbage in landfills would sequester carbon, so we could slowly get back to pre-industrial CO2 levels.
glass bottles you have problems with them weighing way more and breaking during shipping so for that to be "worth it" we'd have to come up with some way to equate the additional emissions and losses with whatever the plastic is doing.