this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
111 points (100.0% liked)

rpg

4794 readers
4 users here now

This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs

Rules (wip):

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been reading about the user revolt on the Twin Peaks subreddit calling for a ban on AI art. As best I can tell we don't really have people posting AI stuff here yet, but I'm wondering if it would be a good idea to ban it before it becomes a problem. I'm soliciting feedback from y'all on this, please let me know what you prefer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tramort@programming.dev -4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

if it drowns out everything else, it means that it's being upvoted. if it's being upvoted, then it means the community likes it. I see no issue with a preponderance of content coming from a single tool when the community is ultimately capable of moderating it just like any other content. why should I not be allowed to upvote something that I like because it came from AI, just because other people have a moral objection to it? I respect their right to object, but I don't think they should be able to force those values onto me. if that is their goal, then they need to articulate an issue and be persuasive, not make rules in communities in which I'm a participant.

[–] kichae@wanderingadventure.party 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

> if it’s being uploaded, then it means the community likes it

That really isn't how the Internet works at all. Someone uploading something just means that that person likes it. It's not like they're uploading based on the collective psychic demands of the rest of the community.

[–] Tramort@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

thanks; that was a typo. I have edited it to upvoted, which is what I intended.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago

'Upvotes mean it's fine' is how you get /r/Funny with different CSS.