I'm sorry but a child reaching freshmen year with their documentation that shows they are developmentally at a third grade level for reading and writing is unteachable. I know that may be a crazy opinion but I've never seen it this bad till this year.
Half a co-taught class developmentally 6 years behind where they should be. My co-teacher is losing their mind. I'm losing my mind. We're doing stories that are 3 pages long and they forget what was 1 paragraph before. They don't know how to operate a google document. Many have lost their homework sheets in their folder less book bags.
I don't even really know the other half of my class since I have no time to talk to the students who are demonstrating the basic ability to follow a 2 step direction since I'm busy putting the fire extinguisher to other half who seemingly have never been told to do anything their entire life.
I cannot scaffold things any lower without it literally being a third grade level class. One child literally had documentation showing they don't understand that stories begin and end.
Our biggest challenge of the year so far was writing a singular scaffolded paragraph with sentence starters based off a short story. Multiple paragraphs contained characters that simply did not exist in the story.
I'm losing my brain
So looking at those levels and the examples they give, I wouldn't say it measures literacy very well at all? They have three example texts and all of them are basically lists of facts. The longest of them is three paragraphs (and missing punctuation, always a good sign). The flaws of standardized tests like this are pretty well known by now, and the skills that are being tested here are only tangentially related to being able to read and understand a novel.
I would not be surprised if most adults struggle to understand, idk, Finnegan's Wake or something, but that isn't really something a standardized test can tell you.
Reading about the actual tiers that test grades participants into, I'm not sure if "can read books for adults" is an accurate description of what tier 4 (which starts at a score of 65%) and above is determining, nor where the sample questions (all of which were extremely simple, straightforwards texts and tasks) fall on it:
It may be a little stricter of a requirement, since it sounds like at levels 4 and 5 the questions are frequently forcing guesses based on inferred information, and notably the highest tier only requires a score of 75% so even someone who is considered fully literate to as much as is feasible to test is still expected to/allowed to fail a bunch of the hardest questions.
I'm really not sure what the lower tiers look like in practical terms: "below level 1" is clearly like a grade school level or below, level 1 itself is maybe grade school level? Maybe 2 and 3 are more highschool level proficiencies? I really don't know what's expected of people or normal at a given level. It seems like the threshold for tier 4 is around the level of "graduated highschool with reasonably good language comprehension abilities" though.
There's also this note alongside the scale, which confirms my assumption that even proficient people are expected to fail a lot:
What % of adults do you know that read a single book every year? Even multiple years. I'm willing to bet it's a lot lower than you think.