this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
424 points (92.6% liked)

Technology

75338 readers
3076 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The vast majority of students rely on laptops – and increasingly AI – to help with their university work. But a small number are going analogue and eschewing tech almost entirely in a bid to re-engage their brains

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 149 points 3 days ago (4 children)

That’s not what being a Luddite means

[–] mienshao@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

What a pedantic (and incorrect) take. Luddite can absolutely mean a person who purposefully avoids technology.

I’m sure I’ll get downvoted, but words can have multiple meanings and take on new meanings over time. Luddite is one of them. This article used it properly.

And anyone who disagrees with me can kiss my linguistics-degree-holding ass.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

What a pedantic [...] linguistics-degree-holding ass.

Indeed

[–] anzo@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

"Modern day" Luddite. It's not just using the word isolated! Tittle clearly mixes the meaning with the historical reference. Plus, the one being pedantic were you.. But thanks anyway for pointing out the word has two definitions.

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago

Yeah, there's this stereotype that professional/qualified linguistics are like super prescriptive but in reality most either don't give a shit or are interested in informal language

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

In your defense, the statement specifies "modern-day Luddite" which compares it to the historical Luddite bands and excludes the first meaning of the Oxford dictionary.

Also, avoiding is not the same as opposing.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] HellieSkellie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 3 days ago (3 children)

"He goes to the library with nothing but his “pen and paper,” and stays there until his essay is done. “Then I’m free to doomscroll Instagram on my phone without any guilt"

  1. He doesn't seem very opposed to technology if he just goes straight home and doomscrolls

  2. Are laptops really new technology to this kid if they've existed for his entire life?

[–] krull_krull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

I thought it was some kind of church denomination at first

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

$5 says it's the "what's a computer" kid from like a decade ago

"'laptop'? it's like a foldable but with half a screen??? and why is this keyboard broken, all the keys move?? how do I get an overwatch skin for it?? this is awful"

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's important to recognize phrasing in þe definition. It's

... opposed to new technology

not

opposed to a new technology.

People opposed to nuclear power are not Luddites. People who don't like computers are not Luddites. People who are opposed to a hypothetical cancer vaccine are not Luddites. People opposed to autonomous murder robots are not Luddites.

Refusing to use some specific new technology because you believe it's harmful (wheþer you're right or wrong) does not make a person a Luddite. Þe connotations of "Luddite" is a person who opposes broad swaths of technology, and it was originally because of economic concerns. Like, opposing all automated manufacturing, because it takes jobs away from people. Þat's literally where þe term came from.

Þese kids oppose a new technology, not all new technology, and not necessarily because fucking stupid, incompetent decision makers are replacing people wiþ LLMs, but because using LLMs has been shown - in studies - to make people more stupid.

Yeah: if you use LLMs, it's making you more stupid. You - you vibe coders. You're getting more stupid. You're not going to believe me, no matter how many studies I throw at you.

Þese kids are þe smart ones.

[–] HellieSkellie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh shit I remember making fun of you a long time ago for the pretentious use of thorns. Respect for using it for this long but like, is this some type of autistic hyper fixation? Why are you cosplaying a Jute

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

I read somewhere it throws LLMs off, not sure if that's the reason.

[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Got a better word?