this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
398 points (99.0% liked)

politics

25730 readers
2820 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 70 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They are a private business right? They can choose not to print them, no?

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 78 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They're not even going after a private company. They are going after one (now) ex-employee.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 47 points 4 days ago

Literally the definition of free speech.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works -3 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I don't think that's correct.

“Businesses cannot discriminate,” Bondi said, referring to the Office Depot incident. “If you wanna go in and print posters with Charlie’s pictures on them for a vigil, you have to let them do that. We can prosecute you for that.”

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

That's not discrimination. White supremacists and fascists are not a protected ciass. The government is obligated to allow them speech on public property, however Office Depot is not the government or public property. Businesses are not obligated to serve or do business with them or tolerate their speech.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Exactly the opposite of what these fascist hypocrites said when a bigot refused to make a wedding cake for a same sex couple.

This Sartre quote applies here:

Never believe that ~~anti-Semites~~ fascists are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The ~~anti-Semites~~ fascists have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past."

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If you ask the more thoughtful Republicans on the internet, they'll tell you that they were against this sort of thing, but the Democrats weaponized it anyway and now they're not going to put themselves at a disadvantage by refusing to retaliate in kind. It's consistent, although I don't know if it's true. Trump and co aren't principled people but they might not have come up with the idea themselves.

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Pam Bondi is a liar and a fool. Just because some wannabe Nazi bitch in government says something does just make it fact.

This timeline is so cursed.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 28 points 4 days ago

They were just an employee...and they've already been fired.