this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
1161 points (97.5% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

2231 readers
183 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5too@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You're conflating work that needs to get done with work capitalists want done.

Yes, someone needs to deal with sanitation. But we don't need a capitalist to own the sanitation system to address this. It can be done in turn, for instance; or volunteers can be rewarded with non-necessity items.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, Im not. Do you think we can get enough volunteers who have the right skills to address sanitation issues?

In most places no one owns the sewage system other than the state.

There is a lot of work that no one would willingly do that is critical and requires a lot if hands on experience. The problem leftist ideologies face IRL is that so many require people who would choose to do extremely dangerous jobs with no realistic plan for how to account fir this.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes. Those jobs would provide more luxury lifestyle outside of the basic needs already. Keep rasing the pay until someone takes the job.

Also the issue is that we think we're too good to do those jobs, but we're not above lowering everyone's standards of living to the point that people have to jump in shit to survive? We can get people to take those jobs, but do we also need to stop judging people based on their career path. That'll go a long way to fixing our nation.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you are talking about higher pay you are talking about a different system than the one proposed. Their system has no economic inequality so no higher pay.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Even in a post scarcity world those who provide more for to society do receive greater accommodations. Captains and officers get larger rooms and houses. But until that reality is possible those who provide more for society should receive greater financial support. Not CEOs.