this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
840 points (98.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

9217 readers
3874 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DharmaCurious@startrek.website 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Probably not to the same level of lane-correct-agressiveness, but my SIL's Volkswagen's lane correct is insane. The roads around here aren't great, and it will often detect random streaks or lines of potholes as a lane and refuse to allow you to avoid them. Once an elk ran in front of the car and when my brother tried to swerve to avoid the damn car fought him so hard we only narrowly missed it. And at other times when on roads with no lane markings at all it randomly decides that the road isn't the road, and that ditch over there is the lane we're supposed to be in.

All that said, it works great most of the time, and we just turn it off if it's acting hinkey

[–] philosloppy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the problem with "most of the time" is that it only takes one car accident to be the last car ride you ever take

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Which is a great argument for why F1 drivers should not use it, but most people are terrible at driving and probably risk much more with it off than with it on.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Frankly, they shouldn't be driving at all if they need something like that to drive safely day to day. The bar for being allowed to drive is way too low IMO (and I thought this before seeing you say that and realizing you might be right about that).

My thought after hearing about a lane assist that will fight you if you don't signal is when I leave my lane without signaling, it means I really need to be out of that lane and not fighting some safety system that works on the assumption that unusual things don't happen. Even during usual situations, it just sounds like a feature that encourages paying less attention.

Makes me glad to have a car where the most it does to "help" is traction control. Hell, even the ABS seems to be tuned for pavement rather than snow/ice and I had to learn to not trust it to help stop in those conditions and instead pump the breaks.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I almost hit pedestrians (twice!) because our Hyundai Kona re-enables the lane correction thing at each boot (I don't know how to say "boot" but for cars, in english. But you get the gist). And I forget it's there, and it's literally life-threatening.

(there are no curbs here, pedestrians have to walk on the roads)

[–] Threeme2189@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I don't know how to say "boot" but for cars, in english. But you get the gist

That's easy, it's pronounced "Trunk"

Edit: It was a joke!

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Threeme2189@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

It was a pretty good one, too, It was just groan worthy hahaha

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No I mean to... start ? start a car ? that sounds too simple,... but I don't want to look in the dictionary

[–] Threeme2189@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 2 points 23 hours ago

I think I understand

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think this is kind of on the edge of definition. Historically, you'd say "start" a car, but these days with cars practically being computers...I dunno. Hell, my car is just always on. I just get in and go, I don't "start" it at all. Occasionally, it has an issue and I have to manually reboot it, so...

As a native English speaker, my answer is: I don't know, it depends.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well thank you for this clarification

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

For what it's worth, you're 100% fine just saying using "start" haha. It's just kind of weird with modern tech

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks I do appreciate it. Once in a while I stumble upon a combination of noun+verb that I've seldom (or never) encountered in the wild and I just stand there confused (because it's so trivial!)

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Of course! Also, I absolutely feel it, I'm learning a second language right now and it's really opened my eyes to the utter weirdness of English, and more so just language in general

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Japanese! Been at it for two years, about to go there and test my skills next month. Both excited and terrified lol.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, nice, have a good one ! My wife and I stayed there for some time (mostly in Fukuoka), she's lost some proficiency since but then but her japanese was pretty good. I personally never got too much into it beyond the basics. But it's a fascinating language and country. If you love to eat I can guarantee you will have a good time.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Appreciate it, stranger! I've been once before, but more just the main cities. We're exploring much more this time around, everywhere from just south of Hokkaido all the way to Fukuoka. Got any recommendations for Fukuoka?