this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
849 points (97.1% liked)

Boycott US

1569 readers
449 users here now

Overview:

The community dedicated to boycotting the US until they stop fascism, restore full democracy and start following international law.

Americans have a moral obligation to resist Donald Trump and project 2025 at every turn.

America is a flawed democracy currently being ruled by oligarchs. Stop the backslide! Dont let America become the next Hungary.

America needs to challenge the court rulings of citizens united v. fec and shelby county v. holder, protect the media, implement independent district drawing, and the single transferable vote so they don't end up having people stay home in life-changing elections because they cannot vote for their favourite candidate.

Join 50501.chat to fight back!


Related communities:

Boycott:!buycanadian@lemmy.ca

!buyeuropean@feddit.uk

!boycott@lemmy.sdf.org

!boycottchina@sopuli.xyz

Activism:!antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world

!petitions@lemmy.ca

!palestine@lemmy.dbzer0.com

!protest@lemmy.world

!israelicrimes@lemmy.world

!patriotsforprogress@lemmy.ca

!goodsuniteus@lemmy.ca


founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's really not that hard for a person of reasonable intelligence to distinguish the difference, unless one is being disingenuous.

[–] HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As a "person of reasonable intelligence" would have noticed, provided they had taken the time to actually understand that statement, I was at no point asking for a difference to be pointed out. Rather, I asked for the ethical reasoning that leads to the conclusion that voicing one's opinion is to be seen as worse than the murder of that person.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A strawman is an argument, not a question. You fit your description of being disingenuous pretty well though I must say. Is there anything constructive u wanna say too or just this?

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wrong, a question based on a strawman is still disingenuous. There's even a term for it: JAQ'ing off.

[–] HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Whats the strawman then in this case?