this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
192 points (100.0% liked)

El Chisme

502 readers
213 users here now

Place for posting about the dumb shit public figures say.

Rules:

Rule 1: The subject of a post must be a public person.

Rule 2: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 3: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 4: No sectarianism.

Rule 5: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 6: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 7: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 8: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Gonna repost something I said the other day:

Liberalism stratifies people into tiers of value. At the top are billionaires, below that smaller capitalists, below that wealthy professional workers, below that imperial core workers, &c. &c. until at the very bottom are working class in the imperial periphery. If harm toward a person in a lower tier has badness value 1, then harm toward a person a tier above them has badness value n, where n is an arbitrary number so large that no amount of violence against those in the lower tiers could result in a number comparable to it; comparisons are only possible within a given stratum because the differences in value between tiers are unbridgeably vast. For examples of this, see: how they talk about Alexei vs. how they talk about (or rather don't talk about) peasant children killed in the Russian Civil War, how much attention they give to imperial soldiers killed in wars vs. the people they're bombing, the Soviet famine of 1930โ€“1933 vs. the Bengal famine.

(For anyone here who does programming, the analogy I'm probably poorly trying to make is to Big O notation)

Tomorrow_Farewell pointed out as a response to the linked comment that small-o notation actually works better for this analogy, which I guess is the difference between my (an engineer's) understanding of a mathematical concept and a mathematician's understanding of the same concept.