this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
1 points (52.6% liked)
Anarchism
4410 readers
1 users here now
Are you an Anarchist? The answer might surprise you!
Rules: 0. Post content that is thoughtful and relevant to social liberation from an anarchist, autonomous, antifascist perspective.
- Be respectful
- Don't be a nazi
- Argue about the point and not the person
- This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your “epic dunks on the anarkiddies” is not. As a result of the instance’s poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren’t just looking to start a fight.
See also:
- /c/debateanarchism
- /c/antiwork
- @lemmy.dbzer0.com
- @slrpnk.net
- Anarchy101
- Anarchism@lemmy.ca
- XMPP chat
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The anarchism comm on Lemmy.ml is for anarchists, yes, but that doesn't mean your content is going to be hidden from Marxists. Again, deliberately attacking Marxists on an instance with a lot of them would get a similar reaction to a Marxist posting an anti-anarchist meme on dbzer0, as an example, even if it was a Marxist community.
It's very clearly not for anarchists if anarchists can't use it to talk about anarchism without being dogpiled by salty dengists who get offended by the idea of anarchists opposing authority i.e. the definition of anarchy
It's for anarchists, but again, more Marxists browse Lemmy.ml than anarchists do, so when you post an anti-Marxist post, even if it's on an anarchist community, you're going to get more attention from Marxists. Communities on instances are more like hashtags than actual communities, in my experience. Also, no idea why you're bringing up Deng, this post attacks Marxism in general.
it's not for anarchists. source: i'm an anarchist. there are no anarchists here. and again, it's not anti-marxist just because it mentions not letting "authoritarians" tell you to grow up a couple of times and mentions that Marxists are "opponents" to anarchists. that's you projecting. I'm bringing up Dengists because I know Dengists when I see them.
This section is pretty nakedly anti-Marxist, and again, I don't see why Deng is relevant here when this is against all branches of Marxism.
They're calling us Dengists because most of us support China (even after Deng's post-Mao market reforms) as a socialist project, but since modern China is one of the Great Evil Authoritarian states by their reckoning, the term is meant as a pejorative. It's basically "tankie" but with anti-Chinese characteristics.
I'm sure you're right, just wanted to tease the fact that they are just being anti-communist in general out. Hiding behind being "anti-Dengist" is a pejorative of convenience for them, but all of their issues apply to Marxism broadly.
I didn't say Marxists were anarchists or anarchists were Marxists. I stated that your issues with "Dengists" are just issues you have with Marxists coated in a less left-punchy way. Deng himself was a Marxist-Leninist working with the struggles brought about from the Gang of Four and the Cultural Revolution, socialism is still the mode of production in the PRC.
As for "centering Marxism," I was addressing your complaints of being dogpiled on by Marxists on an instance dominated by Marxists. There are many anarchist users on Lemmy.ml, and they share their views as well without resorting to thinly-veiled attacks on Marxists.
Apparently these anarchists are in hiding because all I see is Dengists in every direction.
If there are really anarchists reading this, perhaps scared to speak up because you don't want to cross the Dengists who clearly control the discourse here:
I didn't write this essay for spiteful Marxists; rather, it's a heartfelt tribute to young anarchists, urging you to persist in your pursuit of anarchy and resist the pressure from these patronising bores to conform to their conservative values. I see so many of you expressing frustration over Marxists mocking your positions. This essay serves as a form of prefiguration, encouraging newer anarchists to envision a more creative and liberating path than the all-too-common ancom to authcom pipeline.
We all need to stop centering the egos of Marxists in everything we do.
buddy you have a triple digit number of sockpuppet accounts, I think the gravitational pull of that ego is clearly much more relevant
if i were using multiple accounts the discourse in this place wouldn't be so fucking insipid.
Maybe you should lay out a 5 year plan for sockpuppet production and distribution across the anarchist comms on lemmy, get input on it from 4 other alts, then run a great purge where you ban 2 of them.
that would require me to give a shit about influencing lemmy
Anarchism Within One Person
You've been attacking "Dengists" for standard Marxist positions. Further, again, nothing here is about "centering egos," I'm explaining why your thinly-veiled hit piece on Marxists is getting a response from Marxists you've attacked.
Who is centering the egos of Marxists?
I responded to your comment. Am I to assume you're just a troll, then, that just wanted a reaction? I'm not really offended either, nor am I "centering Marxist egos." You made the comment, I answered.
Again, you're projecting. That you see the word "authoritarian regime" and immediately feel victimized says a lot more about you than me. It's talking about all authoritarian regimes from Nazi Germany to Fascist USA to Terf Island and beyond. Anarchists saying authoritarian states haven't liberated people historically is not a personal attack on you.
It's pretty clearly hinting at those who would use the state to uplift the working class, making way for the gradual withering of the state alongside class, ie Marxists. It also directly talks about centralization, ie collectivizing production in the hands of all of society, a distinctly Marxist viewpoint.
Central governments aren't the exclusive domain of Marxists. There's zero mention of using the state to uplift anyone. Holy moley the projection.
The bit about centralizing all power in a single authority is pretty much the standard punch against Marxists. Having a central government is different from centralizing all of production. Secondly, there's this part:
What is this supposed to be attacking other than the notion that a proletarian state can be used to uplift the proletariat?
Why are you trying to dance around?
i'm telling you exactly what you want to hear to end this tedious exchange. too bad the mod decided me talking about the unappealing flavor of boots is somehow 'bigotry'. this place is worse than reddit.
You were free to stop responding whenever you felt like.
you use the word 'free' loosely for someone using a site where bootlicker is considered an unacceptable slur
Are the "authoritarian" mods requiring you to reply to me?