this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
2 points (75.0% liked)
NZ Politics
775 readers
1 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!
This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi
This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick
Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm not sure what standard this refers to, but I dug up this article I remember reading previously (it doesn't appear to be published on the site anymore)
If true, that means a speedo is considered legally accurate if it says 114 when you're driving 100, which is a pretty massive difference.
Bigger tyres is a nice workaround, both our cars over read by 4kph so I just do the maths.
A speedometer that far out is effectively useless, and if I bought a vehicle like that I'd take it up with the dealer.
So yes, Seymour might not have even been speeding.
This is one of my pet peeves; this is not the 1950's; we can make speedometers accurate to within 3%....this margin would account for all the vagaries of tire pressure etc.
Our newest car; pleasantly has a very accurate speedo...
Modern vehicles have GPS calibrated speedometers, and are often dead on. But for an electronic speedo, there's no excuse for more than a few percent.