this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
245 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8526 readers
451 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It seemed to acknowledge that peoples other than Jews can also be victims of genocide.

This is considered controversial because Israel, which attempts to position itself as representing Jewish interests, is perpetrating a genocide on non-Jews as we speak. They deny that they are committing genocide.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Well but if they deny they're committing genocide then they still can be against genocide right?

This is a rhetorical statement btw
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree with your rhetorical statement, but I think I'm missing some implication.

It's a true statement, I just don't understand what you're pointing out.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 weeks ago

Rhetorical because they're fucking hypocrites who believe that killing Palestinians is the right thing to do so they get to do whatever they want.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 weeks ago

ohh, that makes more sense. I thought it meant never again but just for the Jews, otherwise it's okay. Actually my take seems more accurate currently