this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
317 points (99.7% liked)
Europe
5173 readers
11 users here now
Europe
Rules:
- All sources allowed. Voting decides what is reliable unless
- Articles which have been proven false beyond any doubt may be removed
- No personal attacks
- Posts in English, translations allowed
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A strike won't quite cut it. They'll have to physically block ports and then other significant ports must do the same.
At which point the army will be deployed to get them out of the way and/or navy to clear the ports.
Unless there's violence after that, Israel still wins
Italy allows the army to be deployed against it's own citizens? Seems like a weird overlook by an ex-fascist country
Every country does. As far as I know there is not a single country that explicitly bans use of the military for civil unrest/rebellion. It might be stated to be the last resort but it's definitely still on the table. And even if it's banned on paper there's no way they just wouldn't do it when pushed hard enough. The purpose of the military is to maintain the regime, from both external and internal forces.
Great chance to learn something new! Sweden has a law forbidding military use against civilians.
I just assumed that at least the losers of the second world war would have laws severely prohibiting military uses.
Anyway, in states with rule of law it's not just 'paper'. Change or abolish laws yes, ignoring them no. And the purpose of the military can be debated. I'd say their purpose is to uphold the constitution and protect both citizens and state.