doesn't seem like anything problematic (for now) to make jokes
spoiler
A company spokesman told Reuters concerns about a possible relationship between Freixe and a direct report first emerged in the spring through an internal company hotline. The board of directors immediately opened an investigation into the matter, which was however inconclusive, this person added.
As the concerns persisted, the company launched a second probe, overseen by Bulcke and Isla and with the help of an external firm, which confirmed the relationship. Freixe had initially denied the relationship to the board, the spokesperson added.
The ousted executive will not receive an exit package after his dismissal, Nestle told Reuters.
I get the sense that redditor knows in their bones the company is evil but they make excuses anyway. I wonder if they have a relative works for Nestle or something. The comment is so weird.
I think they are arguing that individual as a nestle executive might not be ontologically evil (although I would argue that they are and will be due to nature of business and nestle business specifically), but nestle itself is already a social construct with actually existing buildings and defined areas of exploitation, which makes them embedded in social reality evil.
One could, of course, imagine chocolate making company which only involves itself in water delivery to stranded bedouins in desert business, but because nestle is not privately owned, it literally cannot do this and become this according to laws of the land