this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
330 points (99.7% liked)

History

6910 readers
31 users here now

Welcome to History!

A community dedicated to sharing and discussing fascinating historical facts from all periods and regions.

Rules:

FOLLOW THE CODE OF CONDUCT

NOTE: Personal attacks and insults will not be tolerated. Stick to talking about the historical topic at hand in your comments. Insults and personal attacks will get you an immediate ban.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CatpainTypo@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I’d have guessed more would have been found in southern Italy.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can't find them in a place that you don't look.

Rather, that part of Italy might not be interested in looking (or might not be publicizing when they do).

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The reason for that is that people in the heart of the empire didn't feel the need to hoard coins and bury them since they weren't nearly as exposed to barbarian threats (and others) like the areas on the fringes of the empire.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Dude the vast, vast majority of found coins found weren't buried intentionally.

By some estimates there were BILLIONS of Roman coins minted. They're absolutely all over the place.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely true for single finds, but I was talking more about hoards, which are usually more historically interesting. You can see, for example, how people hoarded high quality silver coins from the early imperial or even the republic period instead of spending them, opting to spend the contemporary debased currency instead.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I wonder what data this tracks