this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
1044 points (98.8% liked)

Political Memes

9357 readers
1753 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Running fiber to low density areas is expensive but there's no way it can be as expensive as launching all those satellites.

Even if it is, the ROI has got to be way worse for satellites.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There's also the cost of relaunching satellites once they run out of fuel. The maintenance cost is also higher compared to fiber.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

talking out of your ass here. satellites don't typically just run out of fuel. they don't really need fuel once they're in orbit. the reason why spacex satellites fall down after like 5 years or sth is because they're in an intentionally low orbit, where atmospheric friction is still relevant.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I literally clapped my cheeks together on the keyboard to write that last comment and couldn't be bothered to provide the numbers or context that you provided to support my statement.