this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
49 points (96.2% liked)

Fediverse

21436 readers
37 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think this warrants a fediverse wide boycott of all piefed/fedia instances until this is rectified.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
  1. It is just a configuration change for the administrator of a specific instance. But if somebody wanted to make politics-free pie feed as a fork of the project, without the opinionated block list, but otherwise following the original project. That would be totally appropriate.

For instance I use pipe pipe which is a fork of new pipe plus sponsor block, because the new pipe developers decided sponsor block wasn't good philosophically

If new pipe gets an update, pipe pipe updates, and it rolls through a couple hours later. No big deal.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Indeed, I agree with what you are saying, but the quoted comment is still incorrect. A fork is not required to change the configuration of the federation list.

A fork could be made later following what you just said, but that's not what was being said in the quoted comment.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have no interest in debating your quoted comment from above. I'm as an individual saying a fork makes sense to get around the strong political opinions of the developer.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

All good then, see you around