208
Texas uses special session to push “discriminatory & harmful” anti-trans & anti-abortion bills
(www.lgbtqnation.com)
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
208 points (98.1% liked)
politics
25492 readers
2255 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
When someone leaves you no other option to prevent this kind of thing from moving forward, you do whatever you can to stop it. Virtue signaling for a few weeks then going back to business as usual while the steamroller keeps rolling over people as you tell it to stop isn't enough anymore.
Yeah, The Governor is the one to blame for this being on the agenda. Yes, the Republican reps voting in favor of this are to blame for supporting it, and so are the people who voted them in to start with when given the choice between a Republican and a Democrat. But the Democrats who just came back from the quorum break are also to blame because them not being present prevented these fucks from passing this stuff and god knows what else to come.
Its not the time to roll over and accept that fascism is coming while saying "well I didn't vote for it" fuck that defeatist attitue.
I am pissed at a lot of this, the situation sucks, "voting harder" isn't the solution here. Yeah, you as the electorate still need to vote in every election and Democratic Reps need to vote no or ammend everything they can, but if there are legal methods to stop this shit (like the quorum break) I expect my representatives to do that because its their fucking job. Saying, "well we tried" is what got us here in the first place and it won't get us out of where we are.
Was "live in exile from your home and state" in the job description or something they campaigned on? It's pretty clear that the D reps could have done more and that Texans need better outcomes from the legislature, but to blame the Dems for not doing more per se is overly reductive. Otherwise, anything less than continuously working to unconsciousness until nothing more is physically possible would still put them at fault, and that's hardly a fair expectation to be placed on any job, even an elected representative.
Your example of working to unconsciousness is overly reductive, as in this case it would actually accomplish nothing. Circumventing laws that are outright harmful by utilizing a tool at your disposal is a reasonable expectation.
By not doing so, there are years if not decades long repercussions for significant chunks of the population of Texas. Best case scenario now, the status quo is maintained in the federal house races. More of this godawful legislation is going to get rammed through the Texas Legislature now that they are back and since they are under protective custody now if something comes up they want to kill in process they can't leave again.
It's not their fault that the Governor is pushing these laws, its also not their fault that their Republican colleagues are voting for it. It is their fault for not following through until they had some other means of stopping the bleeding here. Voting no when there is no meaningful result produced doesn't get you a gold star.
Regardless of whether unconsciousness is actually the peak, if the claim is that D's are at fault for not sacrificing more of other aspects of their lives to achieve a better outcome in their jobs, better outcomes for their constituents, needs some other line to be drawn to avoid applying it all the way to the extremes. It may technically be a tool at their disposal, but that doesn't automatically make it a reasonable expectation; devoting every moment of their lives to their job is also technically at their disposal, but that can't be reasonably expected of anyone, regardless of how important the job is. I posit that whatever line one draws there is what the real issue is, not their failure to do better.
I don't disagree that they didn't actually accomplish anything here, and it's fair to say that deserves no accolades, but there is still a gap between actually helping and being at fault. They are less to blame than, and any rebuke should come after, any of the millions who voted for the R's pushing this plan, even accounting for being elected reps vs voters.