this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
109 points (96.6% liked)

Privacy

41400 readers
578 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been mindful of the ways companies can track my spending habits, and so have been increasingly keen on using cash and avoiding mobile banking/payment apps like the plague. I realize that this varies by country and might be a bit far out, but the thought does linger in the back of my mind. If current trends continue, how much longer until they take cash and browser-based banking from us? Or will there be a reason those options should continue to exist (and be easily usable) far into the future? And perhaps:

  • What else can I, as an individual, do about this?
  • Is there a tendency for larger banks or smaller credit unions to push towards mobile-only online banking?
  • What does it look like in countries where cashless and mobile payments are the norm?
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (3 children)

There's always barter. The vast majority of human beings that have ever lived never once handled currency of any kind.

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Well yeah you don't need currency when value is based on physical stuff Catan style. I make brick, I trade for milk.

But when you have a trade that doesn't make physical goods or doesn't involve the stuff you have to offer you'll need a do-good coupon that everyone agrees to represent value.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Economies that worked without cash still had debt.

Debt and obligation do not require money, but they do require people that will give you the things you need in exchange for "I'll owe you one."

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Bartering is a replacement for currency. There is no anthropological evidence of bartering existing before the introduction of currency. You would think somewhere there would be, but there's not.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

True. But gift economies aren't really something that can just be implemented by individuals living in a modern state. That requires an entire society to be organized around it. Barter can.

I would argue that it is currently a big part of the current economy if you know where to look. Lots of labor works via the principles of a gift economy.

E.g., you help your friend move to a new house, they help you redo your deck, you babysit your brother's kid, they cook you dinner, etc.

The problem with bartering is that it doesn't handle 3+ way trades (i.e., person A needs something from person B who needs something from person C, who needs something from person A), and it doesn't usually handle asynchronous trades.

In gift-based systems, people can literally retire based off the goodwill that they've cultivated. There are many old people who serve their families/communities for years who then get taken care of when they need it.

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah, except that most people are lazy and will default to whatever is most convinient, even if it goes against their best interest. People use social media services that creates entire psychological profiles on them simple because they friends are on it.