this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
-10 points (27.3% liked)

Linux

9198 readers
171 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Requirements:

  • Must be more user friendly than LFS
  • Must not be in the RHEL/IBM family/stream or derivative
  • Must not be SLES or derivative
  • Does not make you install a desktop environment
  • Must have steam

Hopes

  • Rolling release
  • Has a package manager of some sort
  • Doesn’t require manual intervention every six months
  • Maintainers aren’t psycho
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Debian. Set it to stable instead of trixie and it's kind of a rolling release. Testing if you want newer versions. You won't get breakage unless you use sid.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Does that have issues? Part of the reason I’m looking for a rolling release is way back in the late 2000’s, you could upgrade Ubuntu but things always broke and so you might as well reinstall

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've not had issues doing distro upgrades in a long time, and I mess with my systems a lot. There's been a lot of progress in 15+ years, and Debian is usually pretty good about keeping stuff working.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

I suppose if time has indeed passed by 15 years I could give it another shot. I’m moving my mail server from bookworm to trixie by… getting another VPS, testing out configs against trixie, then switching over

[–] who@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Debian. Set it to stable instead of trixie and it’s kind of a rolling release.

Testing or Unstable would be kind of like a rolling release.

Stable currently is Trixie, and has a release cycle of roughly 1-2 years. It's not a rolling release. (However, OP's comments make it seem like they're just trying to avoid major breakage during release upgrades, in which case Debian Stable might still be a good pick so long as they read the release notes before upgrading.)