this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
598 points (95.2% liked)

People Twitter

9008 readers
1463 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 211 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

99% sure this is a parody, mainly because she only mentions her childrens' ages in the context of a bachelor's degree not being enough, but it troubles me that I can't say I'm 100% sure.

[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 118 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)

An article on the subject

Yesterday I found an incredibly convincing fake of a ragepost (on Lemmy - couldn't find it again so sourced it from Facebook). Reverse analyzing the details revealed that the selfies were modified to increase duckface, a pile of cigarettes were added for the narrative, and an accompanying news report screenshot was expertly modified using two different articles and changing many details. I can't in good faith believe any social media meme after this:


All the selfie captions are fake.

[–] oneser@lemmy.zip 41 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ooof I normally think I'm good at catching these, but took the bait on this story.

The only thing that seemed slightly off when skimming was her use of a cafe style/glass ashtray on the centre console, which would be completely impractical for someone who is "always smoking in the car".

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 24 points 5 months ago

Thanks for doing the legwork that one got me

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 5 months ago

incredibly convincing fake of a ragepost

This is considered incredibly convincing?

[–] s@piefed.world 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think the post you saw on Lemmy must have gotten removed or deleted. This comment I found seems to be debunking the same post but the link button leads to a blank page. I do wish there was an archive of removed/deleted Fediverse content for reference purposes (with a reasonable level of censorship, such as omitting illegal content and personally identifying information). I think I saw another post on Lemmy of the same misinfo less recently than a day or two ago but I couldn’t find that post.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

There are publicly available mod logs at the bottom.

[–] s@piefed.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Does there exist means to identify which deleted/removed post the comment in the screenshot was from or means to view that post as it was prior to its deletion/removal?

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Mods typically include a post's content in the mod logs. Click the three .s under a post/comment on the right side, a drop-down should allow you to see what was logged for that post's removal and all other mod actions for that user.

[–] s@piefed.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The screenshot is from searching comments local to Lemmy.world. There are not three dots anywhere around the comment on that page. I’m also on mobile, and tapping a username to see their specific modlog actions apparently doesn’t work.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

Oh, you do have to be logged in, look at the comment from your instance.

[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Oh I actually fell for the original post, I wonder how many more didn't know it was fake.

[–] cevn@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

That was fake?!

[–] sonymegadrive@feddit.uk 5 points 5 months ago

Great work! I did think that news article was a bit too perfect of an ending

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 58 points 5 months ago

It reads like a combination of multiple people's ridiculous individual requirements wrapped into one listing. Like one person said no spare room, someone else said to bring educational stuff, another is only paying $18 a day, and so on.

So definitely a parody, but I would bet each individual thing is based on someone and maybe slightly exaggerated.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

I get the same feeling on this one. I've seen serious ones wanting a degree in early childhood development or similar and offer babysitter rates, but I think they went slightly too far on this for it to be taken seriously.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

I want to believe.