this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
290 points (98.7% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4313 readers
1 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 2 weeks ago

It also restricts ownership of weapons of war.

Since the tank was ancient, it did not qualify as a weapon of war anymore and rather as a museum artifact. But, from another article:

This “Panther” was not the only military device there that investigators suspected was illegal: the operation also uncovered a torpedo, a 5-centimetre caliber mortar and an 8.8-centimetre anti-aircraft gun. The resident of the house also owned machine and assault rifles, semi-automatic and fully automatic pistols and more than 1000 rounds of ammunition.

The 84-year-old was ultimately only convicted of possession of a weapon of war in the case of a machine gun barrel and two cartridges.

That's of course only the violation of the War Weapon Control Act. He was also found guilty of illegally owning "regular" weapons and explosives in the remaining cases.