this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
150 points (98.7% liked)

Canada

10429 readers
863 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

In regard to some avenues of research that’s too bad. Cats are a point of study for weight gain and loss since they appear to have issues similar to us. Some cats gain and hold weight faster than their mates with similar amounts of food. Some cats compulsively overeat while their mates do not. And so on.

[–] Slowy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah not to mention animal testing isn’t just for human medical advancements… a lot of animal testing is to develop treatments for animal diseases, test new diet ingredients (after which the animals are adopted out), etc…

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago

Sadly most aren't adopted out as their systems/organs are wrecked so they get euthenized

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

We do test some things on humans for human diseases, and we have strict guidelines on proving safety / efficacy before human tests are approved + how those human tests are conducted. It might be helpful for everyone (humans / animals) to adopt some of those guidelines to animal studies.

Since yes, as you said, studying why cats suffer health issues can improve the lives of lots of animals. The key is doing the studies compassionately

[–] honc@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

There are regulations, but they’re not the same. I think it’s not really appropriate to compare animal testing to human testing for the primary reason that humans have the ability to provide consent.

For animal testing, I really don’t like the current idea being proposed here of basing this on how we feel about cats and dogs vs. mice and other animals. Some other metric like brain size or something about consciousness maybe, but that’s very hard to determine as well.

While I personally think there’s enough benefit to society to do some animal testing, I think a law that said no animal testing would be more ethically consistent than banning only cats and dogs.

The real thing that should be addressed here is better regulation, not arbitrary bans.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

It was recently announced that a new study using cats showed they developed dementia the same way humans do.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce93rn5g848o

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

many human and dog genes are syntenic, they are very similar, on the same chromosomes.

Without dogs, Banting and Best would not have discovered insulin. That's why the historic pictures always have Marjorie, she was not a pet.