this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
105 points (99.1% liked)

emoji

1373 readers
5 users here now

A workshop for the memes of production.

Submit new emoji here.

A good submission is:

  1. Visually clear at a small size (120 pixel width) [This does not mean upload the small image, this means upload the source image or full size cutout but test prior.]
  2. Have a transparent background to the greatest degree possible. This online tool can remove many backgrounds.
  3. Display a clear emotion or purpose
  4. If including text, should be properly sized to be readable
  5. "Evergreen" and not something that will be irrelevant after the next news cycle
  6. Formatted in PNG, GIF, or SVG to make our file optimization cycles easier. If svg initially, send svg in a seperately hosted link to WhyEssEff. Same with gif, as we render them as mp4 IIRC.
  7. Have proposed title as the title of the post, nothing more, nothing less.
  8. Post body should include a suggested category and keywords.
  9. Max height of 3 times the width.

Rules:

  1. No reactionary or reactionary-adjacent expressions. The purpose of an image is what it expresses. Some clear examples for this rule:
    • Allowed: Broken fasces, burning stars-and-bars, rotated Mussolini
    • Disallowed: Body-shaming, Pepes, gay-shaming the enemy (e.g. those pictures of Putin and Trump that libs love to post), certain hateful wojaks (even if recontextualized)
    • If you think you have touched on a grey area, see rule 7 for how to litigate this.
  2. ~~Nothing Vaush-related is allowed~~
    • To be honest, I broke this rule, so it's pretty much moot. Just run it by me first in DMs or matrix. Vaush is a bit of a dead horse, so to speak, so they're still generally discouraged. The qualification for a viable emote referencing his existence is more a matter of execution -- @WhyEssEff
  3. No desecration of religious imagery. This includes things like burning Israeli/Saudi flag emojis. If you can modify the flags while still accurately representing countries without including said imagery, it is much preferred.
    • A grey area can be argued around whether the symbol has colloquially evolved past its religious origins (one example of this that can be relatively agreed upon is the Union Jack, which is more a symbol of colonialism if anything). See rule 7 for how to litigate this.
  4. Nothing sexually explicit or overtly horny is allowed
    • :hentai-free:
  5. No sectarianism in submissions. Pro-tendency content is fine, but we will not accept content degrading specific tendencies.
  6. No gore, no SA, no sui-bait. Nothing that could reasonably trigger a comrade.
  7. If you think you're touching on a grey area with a submission, message @whyesseff:matrix.org to clear it before you post.
    • DISCLAIMER: Clearing does not necessarily mean that I'll add it, just that it's alright to submit and the rules will not be the barrier to its addition -- @WhyEssEff
  8. No content that breaks the Hexbear Code Of Conduct.

Emoji are added to the codebase periodically. Emoji may or may not be accepted and the dev team has final decision.

All images submitted must be ones you have the right to share with the project. By posting images in this comm, you are agreeing that you have permission to share this image with the project.

Hexbear Code Of Conduct, ToS, Privacy Policy, etc all still apply.

Emote repository, periodically updated on the Hexbear Code-Op.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey all. I'd like to open an official discussion regarding the upturning of the prior Hexbear party line on an :israel-cool: emote proper with the unambiguous Zionist flag.

I want to preface this by saying this is not in a 'ceding the issue' way. Over the past year I've been trying to engage in self-crit w/rt the chauvinism I've internalized growing up in a Liberal Zionist household, and my personal viewpoint on it did a 180 some months back, so I want to reopen this discussion proper in my personal capacities as Self-Appointed Emote Czar.

The reason it's taken long enough beyond that is prior to July, I was essentially half-engaged with the site in order to finish out my degree. After that, it’s been mostly inertia of confirming with the admins and other /c/Judaism mods, as well as having to be rigorous about my job search personally giving me little free time to coordinate this.

I do not want to center myself in this conversation more than I inadvertently already have, so I will leave my own opinion on the issue as a comment rather than explaining further here.

The consensus we've roughly come to is to open up the discussion in an official manner for a day or so. After that, I'll weigh the discussion in an entirely vibes-based manner (sorry Dean Norris enjoyers) and we'll alter Hexbear party line on it accordingly.

lea-bounce

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 50 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Zposter should be unbanned and we should have a proper :zionism-cool: flag. As other users have pointed out it's fucked to equate the flag of a genocidal settler state with all Jewish people

Edit: we should try and institute a voting system for new emotes instead of one person having veto powers

[–] Hermes@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Edit: we should try and institute a voting system for new emotes instead of one person having veto powers

I get your point, but the admin overhead of bothering with this is not worth it in 99% of cases. It may reduce the amount of unused emojis (sorry about my contributions), but fighting emojis are going to be litigated regardless.

[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yea I figured, it's just another pie-in-the-sky idea like having a rotating mod team made up of members nominated by the community. Or having some method of voting to recall mods that have broken site rules.

It'd be nice if we could run more things with direction from the community but I understand it's not always practical

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The Zapatista's junta de buen gobierno/caracol system has deputies picked against their will (to spread political education and organizing skills to combat corruption/death of old members).

The idea isnt entirely unfounded, but do we have that level of solidarity and trust?

[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

Yea that's why I haven't really pushed for it beyond volunteering myself for a few months, I'm not sure how to go about selecting a pool of users that would be considered active/"in good standing"

[–] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

In a real political organization, all members should ideally spend time in all positions. It is an excellent democratic practice. More time-consuming and cumbersome in the the short term due to training and learning. It always requires the exertion of pressure to get people to take roles they wouldn't jump to volunteer for. I'm guessing the Zapatistas can just go to the person's home and pick them up when it's time for a meeting. We are not yet able to strap people to their computers. So implementation difficult.