Privacy

3546 readers

129 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

Be civil and no prejudice
Don't promote big-tech software
No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
No reposting of news that was already posted
No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 9 months ago

MODERATORS

fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com

otter@lemmy.ca

shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com

fxomt@piefed.social

future of the signal messenger (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 3 days ago by cookie019@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I would like to express concern about the future of the Signal messenger. Although Signal currently has a significantly smaller audience than WhatsApp, there are existential risks associated with the messenger covering a larger number of users. Is it rational to say that the goal of this messenger is to be used by the largest number of users, so let's assume for a moment that Signal was able to achieve its mission and most WhatsApp users switched to Signal - I know this is right now unrealistic, but even 30% of users would be an enormous, huge number. Thus, what is the future of the messenger when it starts organizing communications for 1 billion users worldwide?

Would it be rational to assume that counterintelligence forces and special police will send their agents to the organization as undercover workers to sabotage the work and embed backdoors during companies in the context of company growth and staff expansion in this scenario? The question is rhetorical.

I would like to hear the response of the company's president to this existential threat, and to thank for their work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] cookie019@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hi, look, even considering that this question do not have relation to post's subject I would suppose that if you are going to discuss this external threat (from users) I would begin from os level, not from dns level..

So I am not interested right now in this question, with respect

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So you're not running a hardened OS, whether GrapheneOS or a locked down Linux derivate like Qubes? Strange, given your question I assumed you did.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 23 hours ago

Not 3veryone wants to answer this shit. Can you gyess why?

[–] cookie019@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 23 hours ago

Did I say I am not ranning? Please be at the limits of the post's subject