this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
894 points (99.0% liked)

People Twitter

8135 readers
867 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tja@programming.dev -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Have you ever had an open book exam?

[–] BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Open books exams are bounded by time, something an AI has plenty of, ridiculously more than a person, to say it's giving them an advantage is missing the absurdity of the situation as it also had much more time to train and "study", and yet it produces the results it does.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What results? We are assuming it passes med school, so the result must be good.

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The OP is rage bait, all 5 big exams on the path to becoming a doctor are proctored with no electronics allowed. Being caught cheating at any one of those guarantees expulsion (For the USMLE) or never being admitted in the first place (MCAT) or never being licensed in a specialty (Board exam).

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

Interesting, thanks.

[–] BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The results people get from prompting current models, which hallucinate, a lot, and that's not really a fixable issue

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

So then ChatGPT wouldn't pass the exam, nothing to worry about.