this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
307 points (98.4% liked)

Privacy

41422 readers
562 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It feel like we’re losing to Google, day by day. They aren’t killing AOSP directly, but they are making it useless step by step.

Now it’s Google Play Services, Play Integrity checks, installation source checks… more and more apps just refuse to run without GMS. Banking apps? Most of them don’t work. And it’s only getting worse. I run vanilla AOSP on my main profile, no Play Services. I keep GMS only in my work profile for the apps that absolutely need it. But now even some regular apps that don't need any play services won’t work on my main profile anymore. They simply block your from running , like le chat.

Maps is google's most important app there is no way to run without play services. Sure we can use webview or gmaps wv, but they don't provide turn-by-turn directions. Earlier maps used to work without play services, but two years ago, an update stopped it from working. Now that old version is out of date and no longer works.

Google is slowly making GMS very important to run. The problem with GMS is they require to run as system app and has to have all the permissions by default.

Hope EU puts pressure to make google allow apps to run independently without GMS or atleast install them as user apps(like graphene os sandboxed play services).

If we keep going on like this, AOSP can only run fdroid apps in the future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

You can stop using Google and Apple... It's that simple. But it seems that you, like many other, want their cake and eat it too...

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Some countries allow the corpos to lock your device down when you delete it, and they have collaborated with the providers to disallow Open Source OS alternatives like Lineage. The only way I know of is to get a Pixel, which is still owned by Google, and then I think only one provider allows the after market OS to function on network. For those of us entering a dictatorship gov, it really sucks.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, then there's a market for someone to crack...

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If only there was someone that could afford as much lobbying as Google and Apple, we would have another parasite that was just as bad. Lets just get CB radios. Maybe morse code. God, what a shit show. This country is so fucked.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I believe it depends more on people-power, than on their wealth. That's why they spend so much money on lobbying - it's a testament to how scared they are.

[–] zeca@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I dont know if that indicates that theyre scared, its just part of the maintenance cost of their empires

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You don't spend money on something that you don't get profit from. That's just plain logic. They know, if they don't keep spending money here, some politician would end their monopoly.

[–] zeca@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course. Im just saying i dont believe theyre scared because they know they will continue to have more than enough money for lobbying. Its probably very cheap in comparison to what they get out if it. Any business has necessary maintenance costs

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Any business has necessary maintenance costs"... Sure, but not every firm pays to manipulate and bribe politicians, to keep a monopoly.

[–] zeca@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Right, not every firm is a monopoly. Bribing politicians is a necessary maintenance cost of keeping a monopoly. We agree.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So, Apple, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Adobe and so forth, is not monopolies?

[–] zeca@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why? You think they don't do lobbying? Their cartels do constitute monopolies in my view

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So you think they are monopolies... Good - that's what they are.

[–] zeca@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[–] bier@feddit.nl 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's different for every one, but for me it would mean, I can't use Microsoft authenticator, so I can't do my job anymore, as it is required to access my mail, teams, files, logging worked hours, etc etc.

I can't use any of my bank apps anymore, I can't use my phone anymore for paying in a store or checking in public transportation.

And many more apps that would stop working.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tell your employer to provide you a corpo phone.

You shouldn't be using personal device for anything related to your job imho

[–] bier@feddit.nl 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I do freelance work, so they would just tell me to get it myself. But I really don't want to have multiple phones. In don't use teams or mail on my phone anyway, only the authenticator apps (we have multiple).

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 2 weeks ago
[–] pathief@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure but what's a viable alternative for normies? It would be simple if a viable alternative existed. For normies, I reiterate.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's to do the grass root movement, and get enough to demand it, for a provider to feel the need to expand their customer base that way...

[–] pathief@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Normies don't care about that. They care about WhatsApp, Instagram and tiktoks.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

The normie is the battle ground.

They need better info and they need to be hurt by corpos for change to heppen.

Uk age verification should see a bump in freedom enjoyer ranks

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Until they don't... and please don't call then normies, when they really are manipulated...

[–] pathief@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Normie is not an insult or derogatory. It just means "normal person", who is usually not very tech savy.

Most Normies don't care about privacy. They know, accept and are ok with their data being collected and sold in "free" services.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

I don't agree. Most people I know, just don't know how it should be different...

[–] jafranz@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

Quite a comfortable way to do this is with grapheneOS. That really gives you a choice. Can't say much about each and every app, how they run. Although most of my usage hasn't changed much with grapheneOS as I changed from gsm-free custom ROMs. Works quite good with a nextcloud.