Slop.

793 readers

387 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

VILenin@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

Hestia@hexbear.net

oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net

Diva@lemmy.ml

Diva@hexbear.net

mathemachristian@hexbear.net

108

Exploring Left-Wing Extremism on the Decentralized Web: An Analysis of Lemmygrad.ml (arxiv.org)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by LemmySlopSkimmer@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This study investigates the presence of left-wing extremism on the Lemmygrad.ml instance of the decentralized social media platform Lemmy, from its launch in 2019 up to a month after the bans of the subreddits r/GenZedong and r/GenZhou.

We conduct a temporal analysis on Lemmygrad.ml’s user activity, with also measuring the degree of highly abusive or hateful content. Furthermore, we explore the content of their posts using a transformer-based topic modeling approach.

Our findings reveal a substantial increase in user activity and toxicity levels following the migration of these subreddits to Lemmygrad.ml.

We also identify posts that support authoritarian regimes, endorse the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and feature anti-Zionist and antisemitic content.

Overall, our findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of political extremism within decentralized social networks and emphasize the necessity of analyzing both ends of the political spectrum in research.

https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/40188039

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Publication in a conference proceeding doesn't usually count as "publication" in the usual sense. Proceedings aren't peer reviewed. The only qualification is being accepted at the conference, and since anyone can (and does) put on a conference, that doesn't carry a tremendous amount of weight.

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 4 points 6 months ago

Being accepted at the conference is peer review. The process is often identical to submitting to a journal. Submit, get accept/reject/opportunity to resubmit with improvements, and if accepted, attend the conference, often giving a talk.

Conference organizers constantly have to recruit reviewers for this purpose.

Proceedings include the accepted papers.

And you are just wrong about the weight / prestige. It varies by field. In biology, conferences are much less prestigious. In engineering, sometimes conferences are the only thing anyone ever cares about and submits papers to. And there are many cases that blend the two, such as ACM, where conference papers can go into journal issues as well, and this spans many fields.