cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/49655095
This is an Ultegra 11s chain after 1000km of wear from a 1500W mid-drive. Used to ride a Tangent back in 2016. T'was shredding till it went *clunk*.
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
101 points (96.3% liked)
Bicycles
4897 readers
7 users here now
Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca
A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!
Community Rules
-
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
-
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-
No porn.
-
No ads / spamming.
-
Ride bikes
Other cycling-related communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You might find the opposite is true actually. I saw something (maybe on youtube?) recently where someone tested chain wear on a range of Shimano chains by setting up a jig and running it for ages, measuring it at intervals until it got to .5 wear (which is when most recommend changing the chain).
The XTR/Dura Ace chain lasted the longest. No only that, on a dollar per kilometre basis it was also the cheapest chain overall!
They put it down to the added treatment or coating on the rollers that the other chains don't have.
Did it sling road grime/sand and water onto the test rig?
No I don't think so, that would be a good test though I agree.
Based on the fact that the result was put down to the physical difference in the chain material, I'd think that it would still last longer, but maybe it wouldn't turn out to be cheaper by the km, as potential the grime could rip through a coating pretty quickly.