askchapo

Totally agreed, but the anti-America pedant in me feels the need to point something out. That thing being that amerikkka pays lip service to the UN definition of WMD. America has a weapon in every category that the UN covers. Despite that, America falls back on him having chemical weapons. He did have those, ask Iran. That being said, America has them. Russia has them, and damn near every actually powerful nation has them. It’s a loose definition. Nobody gives a fuck about chlorine artillery shells, but it is generally agreed upon if we choose to use UN definition(which America fails on literally every count despite using as a cudgel) that those count as WMD.

It’s not logical or consistently applied. It’s a weapon of the liberal rules based order against “upstarts”.

He did have them, under a specific and hypocritical definition of having “not ok to use” weapons that are inaccurately called WMD. A radiation ray that only targets the pentagon would count as a WMD despite being specifically targeted. It’s a bogus premise hiding behind the general consensus that indiscriminate assault is bad (which it is, for the most part). The definition is flawed.