169
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rocket@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 year ago

Glad to hear that Newfoundland has become profitable. That means we can all move there now. Housing crisis averted!

[-] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

All snark aside. Do you really believe that every human is motivated by capital profit?

[-] Rocket@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, profit is just one side of a trade made by two parties that that hasn't been fulfilled yet. An IOU, if you will.

It does seem pretty clear that all social behaviour is motivated by equitable exchange. We don't do things for rocks – they offer nothing in return. We do things for other people because they do give something back in return. What comes back in return need not be complex. Perhaps it's just a hug, smile, or the press of an arrow button. But there is always something.

I'm not sure profit itself is a motivator. If we agree that you will give me a smile when I crack a silly joke for you, it doesn't matter much when the smile occurs. If you give it to me right away there will be no profit, but I still got what I wanted. If you wait, I profit, but that just means I get the smile later. What's the difference?

Sometimes waiting is significant. If our deal is for you to feed me, I don't want the food when I'm not hungry. It is sensible to want to hold that profit until I am hungry, at which time then our transaction can be settled. Maybe you can say profit is a motivator in that circumstance, I guess. It's really just a tool, though. The actual motivation comes from the trade – being able to get what someone else has.

Perhaps even more significant, it turns out that we get old and start to lose capacity to offer a lot of things to other people in our elderly state. As such, it is sensible to collect those promises of fulfillment (i.e. profit) in our younger days in order to get back things we need later in life when we need them. I think it is fair to say that this is a necessity. Trading something for food in your 20s to eat in your 90s doesn't work so well. It will have turned to dirt long before you get there. Trading something in your 20s for a promise to deliver food in your 90s works much, much better.

But, again, being able to delay fulfillment of a trade until later is a tool. I am not sure it is the motivation itself.

[-] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We do things for other people because they do give something back in return

This is not how I make decisions. That is why I asked the question. The rest of your comment is predicated on that statement and as such, is not worth much to me.

Thanks for the reply, though. I appreciate the effort. I simply disagree and can't imagine a middle-ground that could be reached by continuing the conversation.

[-] Rocket@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The rest of your comment is predicated on that statement

You know, it's really not. A couple of sentence are, but the vast majority of it has nothing to do with that statement at all, and speaks to the broader discussion we were having.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
169 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

7187 readers
471 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS